![]()
Sounds like an SRD.
Sounds more like a set of fast play rules like other companies produce but I hope you are right!
![]()
Sounds like an SRD.
I'm not surprised they picked "no edition number." Mearls has suggested that he'd like to see this edition be more stable than previous ones, which I take to mean they're planning for a longer lifespan. And if the goal is to turn the tabletop RPG into the centerpiece of a multimedia brand, adding an edition number would just confuse things.
It would be kind of nice, though, if there were some kind of easy identifier one could point to that distinguishes the current edition from previous ones. Maybe that's what the red "Dungeons & Dragons" banner is about. It's not terribly prominent on the cover, but it's pretty distinctive on the spine.
Oh, certainly everyone will refer to it as 5E, including Wizards whenever they need to distinguish "this edition we got now" from "them editions we had then." I was talking about the book covers.It will probably end up being called 5th edition whether or not it's the official moniker. Stores and and online merchants will have to have some way to differentiate it when people start looking for it, so it will definitely receive some kind of semi-official moniker, and 5th edition makes the most sense. The fact that it's not on the cover doesn't particularly surprise me, and it wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't even on the title page, but even WotC will need something to clarify which edition they are talking about when they go to sell it alongside earlier editions.