• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D 5E Will you always max out your primary stat?

beej

Explorer
I've been reading the EnWorld forums a lot more since 5B came out. I've noticed that in a lot of hypothetical situations, the character has his primary at 20. Now I realize that discussions tend to assume this because it's the hypothetical maximum, but it also got me thinking.

You see, I tended to avoid maxing out in practice when I was playing under the last playtest rules. In games where we were only expected to reach levels 7-10, I was always more excited to pick feats instead. And when we made high level characters for one-shot "let's fight balors" tests and I didn't want to be burdened with remembering feats, I tended to pump my weaker ability scores.

Besides, at high levels my proficiency of +4 (or higher) tended to make up for my ability bonus being stuck at +3: My attacks still hit reliably, my skill bonuses weren't bad, and save proficiencies tended to match my primary, anyway, so I was covered, there. My spell DCs weren't too shabby either - but that's probably because playtest monsters didn't have proficiency to saving throws. I remember having problems with monsters that had magic resistance.

Anyway, 5B doesn't have feats but I feel like I will stick to the whole "pump your weaker stats" thing (if any of my characters reach level 4 before PHB comes out, that is.) As for my primary, I'll probably start with 15-16 and pump it to 16, at best.

How about everyone else? Is maxing out your primary something you see yourself doing as a general rule for your characters? And if yes, are you going to do it as soon as possible, or will you get feats (when they become available) first?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

"Always". It really depends. If I take every character to 20th, then, yes, probably always.

As soon as possible? That depends on the character concept and the feats available.

Thaumaturge.

Bonus points for using "5B". :)
 

In Basic, it's always better to pump the stats you use the most.

In Standard, it depends how good the feats are, but yes, you still want to pump your main stat, especially for spellcasters.
 

In Basic, it's always better to pump the stats you use the most.

In Standard, it depends how good the feats are, but yes, you still want to pump your main stat, especially for spellcasters.

He didn't ask what was best.

He asked what we would do. :)

That's not always the same thing.

Thaumaturge.
 


It may take a lot of levels, depending on how many feats are necessary for the character, but it's almost always worth doing, yes.

It's possible that there are some exceptions - like a Charisma user who primarily makes attacks that do half damage might decide that +2 to Dex or Con was a better investment, since they could get AC, saves, initiative from one, and only +1 to hit from another.
 


In 5E? Almost always, but there are exceptions - Valor Bards probably don't actually want to always max CHA first, for example.

Feats will matter, too. I can't see a sensible Fighter not maxing STR or DEX (whichever he uses) or a Rogue DEX, though.
 

Given the bounded accuracy, I'm not sure it is all that important to drive to maximum stats.

I didn't do so in previous editions, so I don't see as I'm apt to do it in 5th.
 

Given the bounded accuracy, I'm not sure it is all that important to drive to maximum stats.

I didn't do so in previous editions, so I don't see as I'm apt to do it in 5th.

Importance is, of course, subjective, but objectively, bounded accuracy means maxing a stat early is more beneficial, rather than less, FWIW. :)
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top