I thought maybe it might have been that. I haven't been getting all my subscriptions either.For some reason this thread didn't show on my subscription page, I saw your mention on the RG thread, and then I browsed it in the talking the talk forum. I'm ready to start playing, I'll read the IC soon and make a post-
So, did you see my reply above for your Knowledge (nature) check? There might be something wonky with notifications."I will tell you what I know of Rooks and Harpies. I hope you can add to it."
What, specifically, do you want to know about harpies and/or rooks? (I've given most of the general knowledge already, IMO.)Would it make sense to make an additional Knowledge (nature) check on the part of my druid?
If yes, here it is: 1d20+15=28

So, did you see my reply above for your Knowledge (nature) check? There might be something wonky with notifications.
I assumed you'd take what I wrote and have Phar describe it in his own words. Or were you expecting me to reply with Phar's thought process on the In-Character thread?
Beyond the general info that Phar know, I would say Caerth would know more about how harpies (and rooks) live and behave in the region. For example, while harpies tend to live in temperate marshes, there aren't any major marshland territories in the Standlands. Harpies are more often encountered inland near the Iron Woods. Rooks on the other hand, can live almost anywhere in temperate and warm lands, even underground.No idea; I just thought it might be appropriate for a druid to check the information about natural lore that is given by somebody else.![]()
Okay. However you guys want to play it is fine with me.I gathered from other posts that information sharing would be over lunch. I do plan to share.![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.