Don't be namecalling, mon. It ain't righteous.I am not pissy, trust me you would know if I was.
But you didn't answer the question, you know what nevermind fan boys like you who can't see the problems are not worth the time to respond to.
Because going melee is cool, even if it's mechanically inferiorWhy would someone play a pact blade warlock?
At 11th level they can either make 2 melee attacks with their pact blade, or make 3 attacks with eldritch blast. At 17th level it is still only 2 melee attacks vs now 4 eldritch blast attacks.
It seems pointless to go melee as a warlock, which is a shame.
Hey that's me! My concept is inspired by Elric, and I envision a doomed hero whose powers seem more like curses, wielding a hungry blade for a demon benefactor he both serves and despises.
I can't see why this wouldn't be a perfect fit for a pact warlock.
Don't get all pissy because your question was answered. Ask better phrased questions next time.
I am not pissy, trust me you would know if I was.
Waaay better unless the foe has terrible AC.Because two normal melee attacks are better than three attacks at disadvantage?
.Because two normal melee attacks are better than three attacks at disadvantage?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.