this is exactly what I mean... you don't like a law so you try to justify breaking it... then claim not to be breaking the law, then claim when you tell others to do so that isn't what you said...
lets take another law and try that...
I rob a house...
Who said anything about Robbery? Certainly not me. We have different interpretations of ownership (as do the courts). I choose to interpret ownership to mean who needs it more I needed that flat screen TV and DVD player more.. I also choose to see no difference between buying it myself or having someone else do it for me, as long as it's for personal use...
wait what about killing someone?
Who said anything about murder? Certainly not me. We have different interpretations of life (as do the courts). I choose to interpret life to mean those I deem worthy to live. I also choose to see no difference between killing someone or having someone dye of natural causes... what' more natural then killing?
wait... I can reinterpret any law... rape blackmail arson murder theft speeding piracy...
SO what makes this expectable.... I mean even going just with property and theft...
I want a Nuke... I could google some info, take some science classes, fly around the world buying parts, and make some really shady deals with bad people to get the uranium... why wont the US govement just sell me one of there's... they must be stupid. If I buy one off a guy who stole one, or even if he gives it to me for free even though I know they don't sell them... That seems legal and AOK by your standards....