D&D 5E MPMB's D&D 5e Character Tools

[morepurplemorebetter]

Here is the quote from the Adventurer's League Player's Guide version 3.0 page 11:

"Rules for Dungeon Masters The variant rules for “Playing on a Grid” in the D&D Basic Rules and Player’s Handbook can be used if you and your players wish. Dungeon Masters should feel free to use the Dungeon Masters Guide to help run games if they so choose. However, D&D Adventurers League play does not use any other optional or variant rules as presented in the Dungeon Master’s Guide."(...)

Haha, fair enough, I totally missed that when quickly going through the AL player's guide. You will be happy to hear that I still have the next version remove the actions from the 1st page when clicking the "Adventure League" button. I'm just waiting on some more feedback from other sources before I release a new version, because otherwise this new version would only have this change and I would have to update very soon after that.

 

[Astromath]

I have no problem in waiting. After I download the sheet, I upload it to our facebook page with a note saying to refer to this site for the complete changelog. I don't in any way portray that this is my project, because that would be dishonest.

I only download the normal 8-1/2 by 11 sheet version. Nobody here uses A4 paper (even though it is available). Question: Is A4 paper a European standard?

 

[Headbomb]

A4 is world standard I believe, with Letter being North American. Wikipedia would know.

 

[morepurplemorebetter]

Letter is indeed a standard mostly used in North America. It is a standard adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). A4 is the International Standard (ISO) used by almost all other countries. Here in the Netherlands it is damn near impossible to get letter sized paper. I made the letter version just for you Americans, who begrudgingly hold on to systems of times passed (and I'm not even talking about the nightmare that is the Imperial System ).

 

[Ohillion]

Letter is indeed a standard mostly used in North America. It is a standard adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). A4 is the International Standard (ISO) used by almost all other countries. Here in the Netherlands it is damn near impossible to get letter sized paper. I made the letter version just for you Americans, who begrudgingly hold on to systems of times passed (and I'm not even talking about the nightmare that is the Imperial System ).

And for this I am grateful. Until someone steps up and implements standardization with the rest of the world, people like yourself will always be invaluable to Americans like me. My hat is off to you, sir!

 

[Astromath]

The scientific community in America uses the metric system. The rest of us use the "old fashioned" system.

 

[Noah Ivaldi]

I have been too busy to get to much proofreading lately, but I have to add this:

 + "/n   " + "My druid spells don't require verbal, somatic, or free material components"

Please add that into the Archdruid description. I could have sworn that I fixed that earlier, but I evidently missed it or hit CTRL + Z once too many at some point, so I apologize.

By the by, MPMB, I haven't gotten the chance to check your spell sheet in a dog's age, so I'll just ask: Have you already fixed the spells that were listed in the wrong schools to be what they have received errata to be? For your convenience, here's a link to a recent post by WotC, an article in which they link a list to the errata-applied spell list (with different sorts, handily enough) and the Sage's Advice compendium, which gives more in-depth analysis than the short-and-sweet errata page:
http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/news/rules-answers-august-2015

 

[morepurplemorebetter]

I have found a problem with multi-classing. I created a rogue and that worked great. Next he leveled up and took cleric as his new class. The sheet added both saving throw proficiencies for cleric to what he already had. On multi-classing, a character should not gain any additional saving throw proficiencies. Also, it showed the new cleric abilities, but it also showed the abilities that a cleric gets a 2nd level as a cleric. He is only a 1st level cleric, although a 2nd level character. It appears to be treating his character level as his class level as a cleric.

This was posted in the comments section of the download, but that section doesn't work well together with Tapatalk and I don't get emails from new posts, so I prefer not to use it.

As for the question, I'm guessing you just put the names of both your classes into the class field, without specifying the level of each. If the sheet doesn't find a number behind your class' name it'll assume you have entered only one class. It looks for class names in alphabetical order. So in this case it finds Cleric before it finds Rogue. If you read the tooltip (mouseover text) of the class field, you'll see that the way to enter your classes is "Rogue 1, Cleric 1" not "Rogue, Cleric". Because in the latter case, how would the sheet know how to divide your character level among the classes (ok with level 2 it is obvious, but at other levels it doesn't become so obvious anymore)?

The sheet does not support switching classes, so when you entered cleric and though you were Rogue 0 and Cleric 2, it added all the abilities for a Cleric but didn't remove any of the Rogue's.

I have been too busy to get to much proofreading lately, but I have to add this:

 + "/n   " + "My druid spells don't require verbal, somatic, or free material components"

Please add that into the Archdruid description. I could have sworn that I fixed that earlier, but I evidently missed it or hit CTRL + Z once too many at some point, so I apologize.

By the by, MPMB, I haven't gotten the chance to check your spell sheet in a dog's age, so I'll just ask: Have you already fixed the spells that were listed in the wrong schools to be what they have received errata to be? For your convenience, here's a link to a recent post by WotC, an article in which they link a list to the errata-applied spell list (with different sorts, handily enough) and the Sage's Advice compendium, which gives more in-depth analysis than the short-and-sweet errata page:
http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/news/rules-answers-august-2015

Thank you for that addition. I apparently missed it because the description of Archdruid is so inconveniently spread across the pages thanks to the drawing.

As for the spells, I changed the things that were in the official errata. The spell list and sage compendium you refer to don't have any other changes to spells than what is already in the errata, as far as I can tell.

 

[Ansnom]

The spell sheet generator. I'm confused for the Cleric sheet. At level 2 with an ability modifier of 3, I should have 5 first level spells available. However, the only way I can add spells onto the sheet is to use the - Spells to add to class list, racial bonuses, class bonuses, etc: section to add everything, not just the domain spells. Is this intentional?

 

[Emparawr]

Hello. First off I wanted to thank you for this amazing character sheet and spell sheet project you have put together. Not only is it artistically impressive but the programming is so thorough as well. On behalf of my own playgroup, we thank you. I have had one issue though that although small, is just a wee bit annoying because I dont have acrobat to manually fix it myself. I was using the spell sheet creator, latest version, and filled out the fields for a Cleric 5/Druid 1. Cleric has tempest domain. I filled in the cantrips and all that, went to the spell sheet section to check off the spells I wanted to have checkmarks on the pdf, and the cleric ones worked just fine. However the spells that I marked as Check for the druid section did not show up with check marks in the pdf. I have unchecked them or set them to blank and then back to Check again and it doesn't seem to fix it.