A
amerigoV
Guest
I think Larry the Cable Guy has it right - Aliens have been in touch with us, but they seem to have a thing for redneck fellers.
Every time these discussions come up, people bring up the idea that we're not "worthy" of being talked to by other aliens.
No biota of alien origin in an out of the way corner of the solar system.
The idea is that we are very close to being able to create at least van Neumann probes ourselves, and certainly should be able to do so in the next millennium.
It seems the question ought not to be about why we haven't been contacted. It's about finding no evidence of the presence of aliens. No stray emissions.
Well, we've really only scratched the surface of the *in* the way corners of the solar system. We shouldn't expect to have see what could be hidden out of the way, yet.
We have had something vaguely like powered technology for *less than 300 years* (I'm thinking Jame's Watt's patent on a steam engine here - a whopping 10 horsepower). I don't see how something coming in the next *thousand* years is "very close".
I expect many of us know of the Fermi Paradox. If there are so many opportunities for intelligent life in the universe, then where are they?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox
There are various solutions suggested to the paradox (it's badly named; it's not much of a paradox!) 20 common ones are listed at the above link, ranging from "they're here already" to "they don't exist" with a whole bunch in-between.
What do you think the answer is?
View attachment 75956
Watch NASA Unexplained Files on the Sci channel, it is shocking how many signals have been picked up are unknown and hushed.![]()
No biota of alien origin in an out of the way corner of the solar system.
Certainly this is one answer: We really haven't looked very hard for very long, and in not very many places.
On a cosmological time scale, 1,000 years is a blink of the eye, almost nothing. But it wouldn't matter if the time taken is 10,000 or a million years, since the probe dispersion takes millions of years with known physics. What matters is that the capability seems not unreasonably possible. That is all that is needed to fuel the paradox: If we can send out probes, and intelligence similar to us is common, then we should see probes. But we don't. Either they aren't there, or we don't know how to find them.
Thx!
TomB
Watch NASA Unexplained Files on the Sci channel, it is shocking how many signals have been picked up are unknown and hushed.![]()