hawkeyefan
Legend
None of that is required for the content to be literary. Conversational dialogue(simply being a conversation) is a literary technique. What he does is literary, as is what I do, and what you do, and what [MENTION=42582]pemerton[/MENTION] does, and...
I agree. The scale is from a grocery list to Shakespeare. It's all literary is my point.
LOL No. I'm saying it's all literary. They're saying it's not literary unless it's an attempt to be Shakespeare or similar quality.
No, I don’t think that’s what’s being said. What’s being said is that the concern over the quality of the narration....the attempt to bring the narration as close to the Shakespeare end of the scale as possible...isn’t as important as creating engaging scenarios for the PCs to interact with.
Would you agree with that? Would you say that presentation is more important than content? Do you want to have an actual discussion or simply keep going on and on with an endlessly broad definition of the word literary that renders the discussion meaningless?
You cut out each question I asked in my last post. I’d genuinely appreciate you addressing the questions. I feel like we could perhaps move forward if you did so.