And one thing I noticed is the part of PI, stating "....designs,...formats...., ...and graphic, ...and other (highlighted by me) visual...representations". So even if Fyrlock would (highlighted by me) enclose the OGL, it would be an infringement of copyright ( I think), since he didn´t enclose any license at all. And even if he would, would the publications of his stat blocks be legal or still be infringing copyright rules? I highly doubt it (personally spoken here)
He's not using the OGL, as you noted, so the terms of the OGL have no application here. However, if he was, he - like all of us OGL publishers - would not be able to copy D&D's trade dress. We have to develop our own stat block appearance. By this, we're talking the font, those fade-out red lines, and so on. It's not an arduous restriction by any means. He also hasn't done that, so even if he were using the OGL, it wouldn't be relevant here.
Last edited: