• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D 5E The Return of Tyranny of Dragons: First Impressions

Gamers don't usually ask for a revision to an existing adventure unless it's to adapt it to a new edition, yet that's exactly why Wizards of the Coast produced the new edition of Tyranny of Dragons. Fans online have been asking for an updated edition for some time. The fact that Tiamat and the Cult of the Dragon, especially one very prominent Tiamat follower, factors into the newest adventure, Baldur's Gate: Descent Into Avernus, probably helped.

DnD_TOD_AltCvr.png

Tyranny of Dragons contains a revised versions of the previously released adventure books Hoard of the Dragon Queen and Rise of Tiamat, packaged with extra material, errata and a brand new cover by Hydro74 that gorgeously displays the five heads of Tiamat. While our accompanying image shows off the cover accurately you really have to see it in person to get the full effect of the metallic inks, especially the metallic red artwork contrasted with the black matte background. Unlike Hydro74's cover for Xanathar's Guide to Everything the matte portion is not a soft touch black cover they use on limited editions but it still looks terrific..

Reissuing Tyranny of Dragons in its combined form is not an insult to the original version or, in my opinion, a cash grab. Hoard of the Dragon Queen was produced by Kobold Press, but the team had the disadvantage of creating the adventure while the rules for 5th Edition were still being finalized, and the book was released with before the 5th Edition Monster Manual was released so it was designed to work with the Basic Rules that were online at that time and monsters in the appendix. Logistically, it made sense – give players a chance to start immediately with a new adventure. I don't envy Wolfgang Baur, Steve Winter and their team putting together an epic adventure without a finalized rule set for most of the development time.

As the first official 5th Edition adventure, Tyranny of Dragons, the official name of the two adventures when taken as a whole, is as epic as they come. WotC clearly wanted to kick off with a bang, and Kobold Press delivered. New leadership in the Cult of the Dragon has shifted its focus from undead dragons to plotting to free the dragon goddess Tiamat from her prison in Avernus and acquire a hoard of gold to welcome her return to Faerun (she is greedy, and dragons love a hoard). The plot takes the players through large chunks of the continent as the Red Wizards of Thay scheme with the cult to free Tiamat and a separate conspiracy seeks to shape the world in its image. From Baldur's Gate and Waterdeep to the Sea of Moving Ice and much more, Tyranny of Dragons provides an overview of the world that worked well for new and lapsed players as well as to introduce Faerun to the new edition.

Baur and the Kobold Press team also deftly worked in not just an introduction to factions but weaved them well into the plot as information sources, support and potential thorns in the characters' side, depending upon what the players decide to do. Within the story opportunities arise for rival sides like the Harpers and Zhentarim (as well as groups like the Lords Alliance who frequently disagree with both of those) to work together against a common enemy – but that doesn't mean it will smooth sailing.

The original Hoard of the Dragon Queen and Rise of Tiamat are fan favorites for a reason. It's a rollicking good adventure whether you're completely new to D&D (and role-playing in general) or just new to 5th Edition. Starting at 1st level and taking the players to 15th level before the final confrontation in the Well of Dragons, it gives players a chance to sink their teeth into the adventure, and they can fail. The final battle isn't hopeless, but victory is far from assured.

I do wish that in revising HotDQ and RoT to unify Tyranny of Dragons that they had adopted some of the conventions the more recent D&D adventures have added. Clearly defined adventure trees, dramatis personae, pronunciation guides, etc. are small things individually but make life much easier for busy DMs.

IMG_2433.jpg

The concept art is a lovely addition. Unfortunately Tyranny of Dragons does not follow the convention of the more recent D&D adventures where the artist's name is listed on the page seam so you can tell who did what illustration. Still, in addition to the original art, ToD contains epic new images, details on the dragon masks, the cult's decorative regalia, etc. I especially like the sketches for the types of chromatic dragons with details next to them as if a zoologist was taking notes.

If you don't already own HotDQ and RoT, and are interested in the plot, purchasing Tyranny of Dragons is a no-brainer. You'll be getting a proven, popular adventure in a spiffy new edition with a gorgeous new cover and additional art.

If you do already HotDQ and RoT, purchasing Tyranny of Dragons is more of a judgment call, especially depending upon your budget. While it does incorporate the errata to fix prior mistakes and omission, that and the supplemental material for Rise of Tiamat are still available online so purchasing the new version isn't necessary. If you're a completest, then buying it is an easy choice.

Original edition or revised, Tyranny of Dragons is a terrific adventure. It definitely set a high bar for launching the 5th Edition D&D adventures and well worth a look if you haven't already played it.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Beth Rimmels

Beth Rimmels

It's got mixed reviews. That isn't the same thing as [poorly] reviewed. What actually measures the majority opinion is continued sales and how many people continue to want it and play it now that there are a dozen other adventures they could be buying and running.

Where are you getting the stats for continued sales?

Take a look at the various rankings of 5e adventures, whether on RPG sites like this one or on youtube, and you will find Tyranny of Dragons near or on the bottom of almost every one of them. It is literally the worst reviewed 5e adventure. Are you honestly disagreeing with this?

You've experienced a comprehension error. Perhaps try reading my post again.

Snarky comments and patronizing sighs rarely promote productive discussion.

If you feel I've said something in error, please politely explain why it is erroneous. I've already posted the usage note that covers the grammatical question. I haven't seen you yet offer me the same courtesy (or any evidence at all really).
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Take a look at the various rankings of 5e adventures, whether on RPG sites like this one or on youtube, and you will find Tyranny of Dragons near or on the bottom of almost every one of them. It is literally the worst reviewed 5e adventure. Are you honestly disagreeing with this?

Tomb of Annhilation is the highest reviewed WotC adventure for 5e with 4.7/5.0 stars (177 reviews).

Hoard of the Dragon Queen has 4.3/5.0 (302 reviews) and Rise of Tiamat has 4.5/5.0 (157 reviews).

While not a huge # of reviews like comapred to the PHB (3,670) I wouldn't say that equates to Tyranny of Dragons as being "poorly reviewed" , but YMMV.

There could also be a similar enjoyment dissonance of "general audience" vs. "professional/intense audience" a la Rotten Tomatoes and how those two can wildly skew apart.
 

Where are you getting the stats for continued sales?

Take a look at the various rankings of 5e adventures, whether on RPG sites like this one or on youtube, and you will find Tyranny of Dragons near or on the bottom of almost every one of them. It is literally the worst reviewed 5e adventure. Are you honestly disagreeing with this?



Snarky comments and patronizing sighs rarely promote productive discussion.

If you feel I've said something in error, please politely explain why it is erroneous. I've already posted the usage note that covers the grammatical question. I haven't seen you yet offer me the same courtesy (or any evidence at all really).

Well, it did get a favorable review in the OP (Beth) who really only had positive comments on the art, and not the content 🤷‍♂️ . FWIW. She also implies it's sandboxy with the rival factions, which also raised my eyebrows. Factions are technically there, but they in no way change the railroady nature of the adventure.

But yeah, the reviews of it are not great. Like here, or here, or here (top 3 results in Google, I don't really need to go further; most of us are in agreement)
 

I really hate this paper. It'S too thick and I guess a bit of water will damage it. It has fewer pages than Descent into Avernus but is much thicker. Also map quality is really bad. Did the original ones look this bad, or is this a resolution / paper issue?
 

I really hate this paper. It'S too thick and I guess a bit of water will damage it. It has fewer pages than Descent into Avernus but is much thicker. Also map quality is really bad. Did the original ones look this bad, or is this a resolution / paper issue?
Interesting... the paper is one of my favorite things about this version. I didn't own the original releases so I can't say about maps. I didn't have any issues with them myself.
 

I really hate this paper. It'S too thick and I guess a bit of water will damage it. It has fewer pages than Descent into Avernus but is much thicker. Also map quality is really bad. Did the original ones look this bad, or is this a resolution / paper issue?
I personally love the paper quality. I mean, a ''little bit of water'' will damage the regular glossy paper as well; believe me, I have a 2 years old son at home who loves to use my books as tray for his drinks :P

But yeah, the maps by Blando are little bit of a problem, even in the original: too much details and 10' grids are not that great for the size they are printed in the books. I know people are quite divised with the black and white maps of Dyson, but they are way more usable than the ones from Blando.
 

So maybe, just maybe, my view that the popularity could be due to other things other than being a good adventure isn't so much the minority. I know ENWorld doesn't represent all gamers, but you'd think if it was good it would have more than just 1 person.
I'm not trying to defend the adventure (I loath all published adventures), but just because it didn't make anyone's top 3 doesn't mean it is a bad adventure. Heck, it could be (and I think it is) the lowest rated adventure and still be good. It is all relative.
 

I'm not trying to defend the adventure (I loath all published adventures), but just because it didn't make anyone's top 3 doesn't mean it is a bad adventure. Heck, it could be (and I think it is) the lowest rated adventure and still be good. It is all relative.

I think the actually lowest rates adventure per Amazon is Dungeon of the Mad Mage, but yeah, bring on the lower end of 5E adventures isn't bad.
 


I remember the original having this paper. And my special cover edition of Descent has glossy paper, FYI

My guess would be they stuck to the Kobold Press style paper (same as what is seen in Time of Beasts) because the art was designed for that.
 

Into the Woods

Related Articles

Remove ads

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top