dave2008
Legend
Did I post the wrong printing of the 2e PHB?The original 2e art is miles better than the 2e black cover reprint interior art. Seriously, that was garbage. Worst art in any D&D project IMO
Did I post the wrong printing of the 2e PHB?The original 2e art is miles better than the 2e black cover reprint interior art. Seriously, that was garbage. Worst art in any D&D project IMO
Also which cover, the original or the Easley revised edition I posted?Budgets man
also, I misread your OP and thought you were talking about covers, so that’s what my comment was in reference to
I've posted the 3e/3.5 PHB art, which didn't technically fulfill the brief, but it is what it is!
Yes, I thought about that as well, but i just didn't feel it met the brief of "full spread art" since it was half covered with text. Of course that was clearly to restrictive in 3e's case. I may go back and add those later.I had a quick look and my thought is that each of the chapters in 3/3.5 are artwork too. It just so happens that the text overlays technical drawings that fade out behind the text and towards the bottom of the page.
Certainly, the full page artwork in 3/3.5 is not comparable to previous and subsequent editions. I have to say of the editions, side by side, 5e stands out and, thankfully, loses that leery, 1970s quality. It’s much easier to sell D&D to my girls.
I am scared to ask, what is the dutch angle.Thank you for this! There is one design conceit I would like to not see anymore in these. The dutch angle.
Okay so there are more but that one really grates on my nerves.
Did I post the wrong printing of the 2e PHB?
. Easley. Best PHB cover of all editions IMO. Best quality, and it was all about the PC as the feature subject of what your PC could becomeAlso which cover, the original or the Easley revised edition I posted?
Yes, and by far the most full color full page art.Dude, neat idea! I'm actually surprised, but it looks like the 5E book has the most full page art??