D&D General D&D Art across the editions


log in or register to remove this ad



Wiseblood

Adventurer
Thank you for this! There is one design conceit I would like to not see anymore in these. The dutch angle.

Okay so there are more but that one really grates on my nerves.
 

Catolias

Explorer
I've posted the 3e/3.5 PHB art, which didn't technically fulfill the brief, but it is what it is!

I had a quick look and my thought is that each of the chapters in 3/3.5 are artwork too. It just so happens that the text overlays technical drawings that fade out behind the text and towards the bottom of the page.

Certainly, the full page artwork in 3/3.5 is not comparable to previous and subsequent editions. I have to say of the editions, side by side, 5e stands out and, thankfully, loses that leery, 1970s quality. It’s much easier to sell D&D to my girls.
 

dave2008

Legend
I had a quick look and my thought is that each of the chapters in 3/3.5 are artwork too. It just so happens that the text overlays technical drawings that fade out behind the text and towards the bottom of the page.

Certainly, the full page artwork in 3/3.5 is not comparable to previous and subsequent editions. I have to say of the editions, side by side, 5e stands out and, thankfully, loses that leery, 1970s quality. It’s much easier to sell D&D to my girls.
Yes, I thought about that as well, but i just didn't feel it met the brief of "full spread art" since it was half covered with text. Of course that was clearly to restrictive in 3e's case. I may go back and add those later.
 



Sacrosanct

Legend
Did I post the wrong printing of the 2e PHB?

no, you posted the right ones. Early 90s they did black cover reprints, and the interior art was god awful

Also which cover, the original or the Easley revised edition I posted?
. Easley. Best PHB cover of all editions IMO. Best quality, and it was all about the PC as the feature subject of what your PC could become
 


Remove ads

Top