occam
Hero
Multiple attacks is not the same as 3e's iterative attacks. Aside from the time-wasting low BAB on successive attacks, the main problem was the Full Attack requirement to use the iterative attacks, which locked down movement and turned combat into a boring slog. Note that neither 5e (nor 4e) requires a combatant to plant themselves in one spot in order to make multiple attacks.Iterative attacks are still in 5e. Like, they can even start at 2nd level for some classes, and are much more of a pain to remember (is it a bonus action or not? Can I use this bonus action for this or this?) than even 3e was!
Nitpicky skill points are not the same as selecting trained/proficient skills in 4e/5e.Not as many skill points, but they sure operate differently than in 2e...more like...oh yeah...that's right...3e and 4e.
Godawful feat proliferation is not the same as having feats. Count up how many feats were published for 3e (or 4e!) and compare that to 5e.Still there, and now even mandatory in 5.5!
No, LFQW does not exist in 5e as it does in 3e's problematic implementation.And once again, still exists in 5e.
You seem to be making an effort to entirely miss the point of what people are saying in this thread.