Micah Sweet
Level Up & OSR Enthusiast
Agreed. I value comprehensiveness, and no PH is more comprehensive then the Rules Cyclopedia (which I assume is what you meant).Not a phb but 1991 Rules Compendium.
Hard to beat that.
Agreed. I value comprehensiveness, and no PH is more comprehensive then the Rules Cyclopedia (which I assume is what you meant).Not a phb but 1991 Rules Compendium.
Hard to beat that.
Every chance I get. It was and is a great read.Are you advocating for a return of Gygaxian Purple Prose?
Agreed. I liked having to figure out words and concepts I didn't understand. I learned something new every time I read those books. The 1e books were an intellectually enriching experience. The new stuff from WotC...isn't, whether you like the actual game or not IMO.While I agree with this sentiment, there is another side to this.
Yes, the information is organized clearly. Yes, the examples are clear and concise. And yes, they changed the language in the book to read like a YA novel. The last part, the lower vocabulary and fewer use of compound and complex sentences I am not a fan of.
And for this reason only - Like many of us here, we read these books as kids or young teenagers. They helped us learn how to read and broadened our vocabulary. The new book reads like a middle school text, and for my own personal reasons, I dislike that.
I on the other hand have seen decidedly mixed reactions, at least in regards to the artwork.I’ve been hearing this consistently: the layout, organization and artwork of the book is absolutely top notch.
Insulting an intellectual take on writing (or at least a higher grade level of vocabulary) isn't a better take from my point of view. Awkward and pathetic? Not exactly polite.A sane mind doesn't support it! It did have its charms though. As goofy (and a little bit awkward and pathetic... in that 'I hear using big words makes me sound smart' kind of way) as it was, that writing style did pull you in to the magical world that was being laid before you.
I would think the rules themselves would be a (major) relevant factor regarding whether or not a PH can be called, "the greatest ever". Yet people keep getting hung up on the pretty wrapping paper and gift box.You can't please everyone of course, but I'm still using the gritty rest rules from the 2014 DMG. We'll see if we get any better option in November, one can always hope.
But yeah, there seems to be a preponderance of spellcasters nowadays. I'm okay with it I guess but if you want old school gritty less fantastic adventuring, there are better options out there.
But ... as the OP stated, they were talking about layout and presentation more than the actual game itself.
yes, it’s 5e with slight tweaks, if you like high magic superheroics, that is what you get more ofI would think the rules themselves would be a (major) relevant factor regarding whether or not a PH can be called, "the greatest ever".
it’s the most noticeable changeYet people keep getting hung up on the pretty wrapping paper and gift box.
I would think the rules themselves would be a (major) relevant factor regarding whether or not a PH can be called, "the greatest ever". Yet people keep getting hung up on the pretty wrapping paper and gift box.
I'm not claiming the 2024 rules are the best version of Dungeon & Dragons ever. Although I believe they probably are, it's a matter of personal taste. Reasonable people can disagree.
But there is no doubt the 2024 PHB is the best Player's Handbook ever published.
Agreed. I value comprehensiveness, and no PH is more comprehensive then the Rules Cyclopedia (which I assume is what you meant).