Zak Smith is suing his accusers

[Arnwolf666]

And your evidence that he is falsely accused in this instance is...?

Innocent until proven guilty. I will not treat this man unkindly or smear this man until he is convicted. It is the same courtesy I hope someone would show me if I was accused.

 

[Morrus]

Innocent until proven guilty. I will not treat this man unkindly or smear this man until he is convicted. It is the same courtesy I hope someone would show me if I was accused.

So let me get this straight.

Anybody can do anything. If it isn’t a criminal offence, and that person isn’t put on trial, and convicted of a crime, then it doesn’t matter what anybody does?

Somebody calls your mother horrible names in the street. They aren’t convicted of a crime. You will not judge them at all for it?

Somebody breaks a contract, causing hardship to many families. They aren’t convicted of a criminal offence though, so it’s A-OK in your book?

You find out your babysitter is stealing from you. You can’t prove it, so there is no criminal trial. You continue to employ them?

The only thing you will judge somebody for is a guilty verdict in a criminal trial? Nothing else?

You’re not judging me right now for this post? Not even a little bit?

 

[lowkey13]

*Deleted by user*

 

[Arnwolf666]

And do you hold this standard for everything, or just for men accused of sexual impropriety?

For example, if there were multiple, credible allegations of child abuse, would you still let that person watch your kids? Or do you need a conviction first?

If you found evidence that someone was embezzling from you at work, but the police didn't want to prosecute, would you keep the person employed because, hey, no conviction?

Do you refuse to form opinions about any person you know unless and until they are convicted of a crime because, hey, due process?

I'm guessing no. I'm thinking that you have a special group that you reserve this privilege for.


(NINJA'd by Morrus)

I don’t judge anyone I don’t know as guilty of anything unless I can see the evidence. Just like i hope no one ever does to me. I can completely understand the girls parents siding with her and her friends believing her. And the same for the guys friends and family. I would not want to be judged by these standards. It is terrifying that i would be.

 

[Morrus]

I don’t judge anyone I don’t know as guilty of anything unless I can see the evidence. Just like i hope no one ever does to me. I can completely understand the girls parents siding with her and her friends believing her. And the same for the guys friends and family. I would not want to be judged by these standards. It is terrifying that i would be.

What are you worried about being judged for?

 

[Arnwolf666]

What are you worried about being judged for?

I am worried about being falsely accused of domestic violence and rape and losing my livelihood due to public opinion. That terrifies me

 

[lowkey13]

*Deleted by user*

 

[Morrus]

I am worried about being falsely accused of domestic violence and rape and losing my livelihood due to public opinion. That terrifies me

The best defence against that is to make sure you never behave in a way that would make somebody accuse you of domestic violence and rape; namely don’t commit domestic violence or rape. You’ll be fine.

 

[Arnwolf666]

The best defence against that is to make sure you never behave in a way that would make somebody accuse you of domestic violence and rape; namely don’t commit domestic violence or rape. You’ll be fine.

So people are never falsely accused. If one of accused it must be true. Is that what you are saying?

 

[Arnwolf666]

The best defence against that is to make sure you never behave in a way that would make somebody accuse you of domestic violence and rape; namely don’t commit domestic violence or rape. You’ll be fine.

Then take it to court. Get him convicted.