Science does provides a better path. Wuhan has to all appearances defeated the Covid-19 bug. Even outside of Wuhan, where it was less epidemic, the cases are being choked off. We can detect it, and it is slow enough to spread that even an active epidemic can be choked off.@NotAYakk
Those would be public health measures, as I mentioned.
Sometimes, life only gives you bad options, and you have to choose which is the least sucky. It doesn’t matter what the predictive stats tell us if science is unable to provide a better path.
There is what appears to be a path forward that isn't 10 years in house arrest.
The predictive stats say what happens if we choose other paths. We go with 10 years+ house arrest where 1% of the world dies to this, we go with 5%+ mortality of everyone, or we pick a costly, annoying, hard path and beat it.
Do you vote for 10+ years of house arrest, 2 million dead in USA, and 200 million dead worldwide? Do you vote for 350 million dead worldwide and no more house arrest anywhere? Or do you vote for doing something difficult?
Or do you vote for "I hope we get lucky with medical science"?
Knowing what the alternatives are, it makes paying the price easier.