D&D 5E WotC's Jeremy Crawford on D&D Races Going Forward

On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty. @ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence...

Status
Not open for further replies.
On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty.


636252771691385727.jpg


@ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence debuff and the evil alignment, with a more acceptable narrative. It's a start, but there's a fair argument for gutting the entire race system.

The orcs of Eberron and Wildemount reflect where our hearts are and indicate where we’re heading.


@vorpaldicepress I hate to be "that guy", but what about Drow, Vistani, and the other troublesome races and cultures in Forgotten Realms (like the Gur, another Roma-inspired race)? Things don't change over night, but are these on the radar?

The drow, Vistani, and many other folk in the game are on our radar. The same spirit that motivated our portrayal of orcs in Eberron is animating our work on all these peoples.


@MileyMan1066 Good. These problems need to be addressed. The variant features UA could have a sequel that includes notes that could rectify some of the problems and help move 5e in a better direction.

Addressing these issues is vital to us. Eberron and Wildemount are the first of multiple books that will face these issues head on and will do so from multiple angles.


@mbriddell I'm happy to hear that you are taking a serious look at this. Do you feel that you can achieve this within the context of Forgotten Realms, given how establised that world's lore is, or would you need to establish a new setting to do this?

Thankfully, the core setting of D&D is the multiverse, with its multitude of worlds. We can tell so many different stories, with different perspectives, in each world. And when we return to a world like FR, stories can evolve. In short, even the older worlds can improve.


@SlyFlourish I could see gnolls being treated differently in other worlds, particularly when they’re a playable race. The idea that they’re spawned hyenas who fed on demon-touched rotten meat feels like they’re in a different class than drow, orcs, goblins and the like. Same with minotaurs.

Internally, we feel that the gnolls in the MM are mistyped. Given their story, they should be fiends, not humanoids. In contrast, the gnolls of Eberron are humanoids, a people with moral and cultural expansiveness.


@MikeyMan1066 I agree. Any creature with the Humanoid type should have the full capacity to be any alignmnet, i.e., they should have free will and souls. Gnolls... the way they are described, do not. Having them be minor demons would clear a lot of this up.

You just described our team's perspective exactly.


As a side-note, the term 'race' is starting to fall out of favor in tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder has "ancestry", and other games use terms like "heritage"); while he doesn't comment on that specifically, he doesn't use the word 'race' and instead refers to 'folks' and 'peoples'.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
I'm not going to sit here and defend slavery, but ancient slavery was a damned sight less hypocritical than modern slavery.
I was about to say that. In a way, Greek and Viking slavery was more respectable than American Slavery. I'm not saying it was good, I don't like slavery in any sense (even modern US legal slavery in the jail system) but what we did was worse than what the ancients did.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Sure, that could be an explanation.

Or maybe....
They started out as miniature wargamers,
wrote up some fantasy based mods for what they were playing so that they could do LotR style minis battles,
refined that down into a new game style where they could tell/play their own Fellowship of the Ring type stories,
wich resulted in groups of adventurers raiding dungeons & crypts in search of treasure and fighting ever nastier monsters the deeper in they went.
And along the way they did exactly what everyone of us do today - the borrowed everything from their favorite adventure stories/myths/movies etc & threw it into the mix - hence Elves vs Dwarfs etc. Orcs from JRRT. etc etc etc
I very much doubt that they were using D&D as some sort of racism therapy.

I did not mean they consciously went to a psychiatrist who recommended Play Theory.

I mean, I think they tried to not be racists in reallife, and in their own safe gaming space were "playing" with these issues of their day.
 
Last edited:

Coroc

Hero
What my explanation means is that white dudes rule the world. Even if your feelings get hurt, it's nothing like a racial slur directed at someone you have more power than.

Your explanation is a perfect example of "It is not a wrongdoing if the right faction does it".

Do you think you can convince dumb people thinking in racial stereotypes to alter their view with that kind of attitude?
So am I also in the right, to insult everyone of higher social status/wealth/power etc. but when he does it to me then it is a hate crime?

And btw. I neither rule the world, nor would I get hurt much if someone would be calling me a gringo, I would just laugh at that one. Because I know how to dance, eat the spicy food and how to love Latina women.
But that is just me, others would feel insulted, if they knew the true meaning and intention of that word, and would feel confirmed in their stereotype thinking.
 

Coroc

Hero
I find it vaguely depressing that people cite scenes from the movies as if they have anything to do with Middle-earth lore.

Sorry that was not my intention, I read the LOTR trilogy as well as the whole Silmarillion some 40 years ago, and my first cinematic confrontation with that topic was the semi cartoon masterpiece by Ralph Bakshi. I took the scene of the modern blockbuster, because it is so well illustrating the serious, not rethoric question I had, because I forgot some of the lore. f you want to help me, can you clarify If the Tolkien lore states something about orcs and their roots which makes them different to e.g. standard D&D orcs?
 

Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
The scene from Community with the Drow makeup literally has a joke about blackface. It was done to point out how Drow could be racist.
You mean Shirley’s comment about ”ignoring the hate crime”? Shirley, whose stereotypically underinformed social/religious conservatism is a consistent comedic device? (Kind of like Betty White’s Rose from Golden Girls.)

Or were you meaning Pierce’s “Al Jolson“ crack? Pierce being a stereotypical racist, bigoted, misogynistic jerk with zero self awareness of how awful he is?

Again, merely darkening one’s skin for the purpose of a role does not equal the blackface of minstrelry. Saying Chang’s Drow is the same as the stuff Jolson (and others) did is like saying Cheetas and Spotted Leopards are the same based in their spots.

The lack of using makeup & costume to accentuate stereotypical features; the lack of offensive mannerisms...the similarities are literally only skin deep. It’s almost meta-racist to claim all incidents of using black makeup look alike when major differences at plainly obvious.

1592373928765.jpeg

1592374244033.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Coroc

Hero
I don’t know if it has or hasn’t, but I will say that that style of Drow makeup differs significantly from the blackface we usually associate with racism.

Well the pointy ears are really not a part of the typical blackface, as is the white hair, so people seeing blackface should look a bit more closely.
 

ccs

41st lv DM
I did not mean they consciously went to a psychiatrist who recommended Play Theory.

I mean, I think they tried to not be racists in reallife, and in their own safe gaming space were "playing" with these issues of their day.

Yeah I know what you meant. I still very much doubt it.

But like I said, it could be an explanation. Multiverse theory & all....
 

Coroc

Hero
The scene from Community with the Drow makeup literally has a joke about blackface. It was done to point out how Drow could be racist.

...

Well, and that is forcing a topic into an artificial guilt by association conflict. Drow cannot be racist in a RL sense, because they are purely fictional.

But of course they* behave racist in game versus almost all other races (*The classical FR drow not the Eberron drow in this case), that is trivial and makes them more despicable in a classic campaign.
 

Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
Well the pointy ears are really not a part of the typical blackface, as is the white hair, so people seeing blackface should look a bit more closely.
I took the lack of pointy ears as a given. Maybe I shouldn’t have.

I’ll say, though, one of my paternal grand-uncles had long silver, naturally straight hair that made him look like an extra from a classic B&W “Cowboys & Indians” movie. He could have easily styled his hair like Chang’s...if he‘d let scissors anywhere near his head...
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top