D&D General WotC’s Official Announcement About Diversity, Races, and D&D

Following up on recent discussions on social media, WotC has made an official announcement about diversity and the treatment of ‘race’ in D&D.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Following up on recent discussions on social media, WotC has made an official announcement about diversity and the treatment of ‘race’ in D&D. Notably, the word ‘race’ is not used; in its place are the words ‘people’ and 'folk'.

2A4C47E3-EAD6-4461-819A-3A42B20ED62A.png


 PRESS RELEASE


Dungeons & Dragons teaches that diversity is strength, for only a diverse group of adventurers can overcome the many challenges a D&D story presents. In that spirit, making D&D as welcoming and inclusive as possible has moved to the forefront of our priorities over the last six years. We’d like to share with you what we’ve been doing, and what we plan to do in the future to address legacy D&D content that does not reflect who we are today. We recognize that doing this isn’t about getting to a place where we can rest on our laurels but continuing to head in the right direction. We feel that being transparent about it is the best way to let our community help us to continue to calibrate our efforts.

One of the explicit design goals of 5th edition D&D is to depict humanity in all its beautiful diversity by depicting characters who represent an array of ethnicities, gender identities, sexual orientations, and beliefs. We want everyone to feel at home around the game table and to see positive reflections of themselves within our products. “Human” in D&D means everyone, not just fantasy versions of northern Europeans, and the D&D community is now more diverse than it’s ever been.

Throughout the 50-year history of D&D, some of the peoples in the game—orcs and drow being two of the prime examples—have been characterized as monstrous and evil, using descriptions that are painfully reminiscent of how real-world ethnic groups have been and continue to be denigrated. That’s just not right, and it’s not something we believe in. Despite our conscious efforts to the contrary, we have allowed some of those old descriptions to reappear in the game. We recognize that to live our values, we have to do an even better job in handling these issues. If we make mistakes, our priority is to make things right.

Here’s what we’re doing to improve:
  • We present orcs and drow in a new light in two of our most recent books, Eberron: Rising from the Last War and Explorer's Guide to Wildemount. In those books, orcs and drow are just as morally and culturally complex as other peoples. We will continue that approach in future books, portraying all the peoples of D&D in relatable ways and making it clear that they are as free as humans to decide who they are and what they do.
  • When every D&D book is reprinted, we have an opportunity to correct errors that we or the broader D&D community discovered in that book. Each year, we use those opportunities to fix a variety of things, including errors in judgment. In recent reprintings of Tomb of Annihilation and Curse of Strahd, for example, we changed text that was racially insensitive. Those reprints have already been printed and will be available in the months ahead. We will continue this process, reviewing each book as it comes up for a reprint and fixing such errors where they are present.
  • Later this year, we will release a product (not yet announced) that offers a way for a player to customize their character’s origin, including the option to change the ability score increases that come from being an elf, a dwarf, or one of D&D's many other playable folk. This option emphasizes that each person in the game is an individual with capabilities all their own.
  • Curse of Strahd included a people known as the Vistani and featured the Vistani heroine Ezmerelda. Regrettably, their depiction echoes some stereotypes associated with the Romani people in the real world. To rectify that, we’ve not only made changes to Curse of Strahd, but in two upcoming books, we will also show—working with a Romani consultant—the Vistani in a way that doesn’t rely on reductive tropes.
  • We've received valuable insights from sensitivity readers on two of our recent books. We are incorporating sensitivity readers into our creative process, and we will continue to reach out to experts in various fields to help us identify our blind spots.
  • We're proactively seeking new, diverse talent to join our staff and our pool of freelance writers and artists. We’ve brought in contributors who reflect the beautiful diversity of the D&D community to work on books coming out in 2021. We're going to invest even more in this approach and add a broad range of new voices to join the chorus of D&D storytelling.
And we will continue to listen to you all. We created 5th edition in conversation with the D&D community. It's a conversation that continues to this day. That's at the heart of our work—listening to the community, learning what brings you joy, and doing everything we can to provide it in every one of our books.

This part of our work will never end. We know that every day someone finds the courage to voice their truth, and we’re here to listen. We are eternally grateful for the ongoing dialog with the D&D community, and we look forward to continuing to improve D&D for generations to come.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

UngainlyTitan

Legend
Supporter
No, with a well designed PDF, I can generally use a screen reader. If the PDF is poorly put together and had not been OCR'd at all (the Dragonlance Age of Mortals from 3.5 for example) then you can do nothing with it. The PDF is just a collection of scanned images without the text being embedded. Even using ClaroPDF, you cannot do anything. You're right that the password protection does prevent me running a OCR program on the PDF myself (though that has issues too—but it is doable). Occasionally, with some permissions it does become harder to use a PDF, but I've only really encountered that with material that's pretty sensitive.

A shining star here is Kobold Press because they don't do anything to hinder accessibility with their products. Hell, I can even delete pages if I want with their PDFs.
OK, Perhaps, however, OCR was originally designed to read text of a scanned image and i have used OCR to do just that I suspect there is a DRM issue. However, the only useful suggestions I can make at this point is to: reach out to WoTC people on twitter or other social media with your problem. I would also, if possible draw attention the people that make the screen reader to the issue.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

BnaaUK

Explorer
OK, Perhaps, however, OCR was originally designed to read text of a scanned image and i have used OCR to do just that I suspect there is a DRM issue. However, the only useful suggestions I can make at this point is to: reach out to WoTC people on twitter or other social media with your problem. I would also, if possible draw attention the people that make the screen reader to the issue.

I've brought it up in the support and feedback. Both with WotC and OBS.

I don't really do social media because it's just hellish landscape that seems best avoided. :)
 

I've brought it up in the support and feedback. Both with WotC and OBS.

I don't really do social media because it's just hellish landscape that seems best avoided. :)

Social media is a hellscape, but it can be useful in this kind of situation, as it's public, with this sort of issue, it's much more likely you'll find people who agree than attack you, particularly as good OCRing benefits everyone (sad to say but when people's interests align they're much more likely to support something). I am disappointed to hear you haven't had any response. If this is caused by DRM stuff I think they're going to need to take a hard look at how they're doing that. Still I understand the reluctance.

Also totally personal note but bad OCR'ing is basically a crime in my eyes, as someone who worked in a law firm library/research department for years! With a bit of effort you can almost always do a good job, but so few people do.
 

pukunui

Legend
The pink hair was kind of a bait no one took (as well as a WoW reference, so there is that). How would a DnD character get their hand on elusive pink dye? Assuming pink is an unlikely candidate for natural hair color even for Gnomes.
I'm sure there's a spell for that somewhere. ;)
 

opacitizen

Explorer
While I really appreciate their intent, I'm not sure how (and if) this is going to work in a fictional universe (or a bunch of them) traditionally featuring explicit good and evil as one of its main plot drivers, if they take this seriously.

Will elven longevity be optional? Long ears be optional? Can a human have them? Can an elf have half-orc tusks too? Will dwarves no longer be fans of gold (because that can be seen as a negative stereotype, too.) If everything will be optional, what will make an elf an elf instead of it being a variant human? Or a human a variant elf, or an elf a variant dwarf, or a dwarf a variant drow?

Also, will vampires and werewolves be morally diverse as well? (If not, why not? How are they different monsters than orcs and drow... used to be?) What about red dragons? Beholders? Devils and demons and angels? Where do they draw the line? And why there?

Or am I just terribly misunderstanding something? (If that's the case, sorry.)

Also, if they're serious about this, maybe check the words they use…

"(…) real-world ethnic groups have been and continue to be denigrated. (…)"
 


BnaaUK

Explorer
Social media is a hellscape, but it can be useful in this kind of situation, as it's public, with this sort of issue, it's much more likely you'll find people who agree than attack you, particularly as good OCRing benefits everyone (sad to say but when people's interests align they're much more likely to support something). I am disappointed to hear you haven't had any response. If this is caused by DRM stuff I think they're going to need to take a hard look at how they're doing that. Still I understand the reluctance.

Also totally personal note but bad OCR'ing is basically a crime in my eyes, as someone who worked in a law firm library/research department for years! With a bit of effort you can almost always do a good job, but so few people do.

I'm with you on bad OCR'ing. :)

And I've definitely had people get annoyed in various D&D communities with my advocating for people who can't use physical books or who need decent PDFs for the products. It wasn't until D&D Beyond became a thing that I was finally able to read the entire 5e D&D rules, before I had to make do with the limited Basic Rules and SRD. (Neither of those PDFs were well done either if I recall - same with a number of the UA articles).
 

Tales and Chronicles

Jewel of the North, formerly know as vincegetorix
If this is so minor why does it bother for you? Should now dwarves also get +5 to speed and elves +1 HP per level? I mean correct language and avoiding hurting real live minorities by pushing stereotypes is a noble thing, but just because some powergamers always have issues with racial bonus stats we now have to claim that this is an racism issue?

I want more bonus and if 5e math hadn't bound accuracy I would like malus stats also to make PCs more different. So am I racist now? Married to a black woman, having children with her but I do like racial bonus stats and now I am a racist?

Dont mean to be rude here, but...what are you talking about? Never talked about racist or whatever, I just poited to warpiglet that the +X from a race is not the only diferenciation between race A and race B.

I think you may be a little worked up by previous threads and read too much in my post.
 

I'm with you on bad OCR'ing. :)

And I've definitely had people get annoyed in various D&D communities with my advocating for people who can't use physical books or who need decent PDFs for the products. It wasn't until D&D Beyond became a thing that I was finally able to read the entire 5e D&D rules, before I had to make do with the limited Basic Rules and SRD. (Neither of those PDFs were well done either if I recall - same with a number of the UA articles).

I know it's not the issue here, but just as an aside, does Beyond do okay with screenreaders and so on? My wife is an IT director at a charity and it is amazing/horrifying how even in that sector, so many people are just like "I don't think we need to follow any rules here..." about making web stuff screenreadable and generally friendly to people with disabilities, and she has to fight with them to get it done right.
 

Var

Explorer
I for one am really looking forward to my upcoming Lawful Stupid Barlgura PC who doesn't let the predjudice against his race or the lack of opposable thumbs get in the way of his dream to become a romance novelist.

It's so mean to depict an entire race of sentient non humanoids as evil. There surely is room for more nuance to their motives given just how many of them exist. His best bud is a really shy Aboleth that just wants to be hugged but can't, since his touch turns everyone into eldritch things - the agony is real for him.

At least we have the occasional inclusive DM depicting heroic, noble Orcs with a warrior code already.
I can't approve of any more inclusive environment that conveniently forgets about the real victims no one even asked to redeem. The guys no one ever stood up for ever, just because they're apparently alien evils or something.
#hugsagainstdemonophobics
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top