D&D 5E WotC's Jeremy Crawford on D&D Races Going Forward

Status
Not open for further replies.
On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty.


636252771691385727.jpg


@ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence debuff and the evil alignment, with a more acceptable narrative. It's a start, but there's a fair argument for gutting the entire race system.

The orcs of Eberron and Wildemount reflect where our hearts are and indicate where we’re heading.


@vorpaldicepress I hate to be "that guy", but what about Drow, Vistani, and the other troublesome races and cultures in Forgotten Realms (like the Gur, another Roma-inspired race)? Things don't change over night, but are these on the radar?

The drow, Vistani, and many other folk in the game are on our radar. The same spirit that motivated our portrayal of orcs in Eberron is animating our work on all these peoples.


@MileyMan1066 Good. These problems need to be addressed. The variant features UA could have a sequel that includes notes that could rectify some of the problems and help move 5e in a better direction.

Addressing these issues is vital to us. Eberron and Wildemount are the first of multiple books that will face these issues head on and will do so from multiple angles.


@mbriddell I'm happy to hear that you are taking a serious look at this. Do you feel that you can achieve this within the context of Forgotten Realms, given how establised that world's lore is, or would you need to establish a new setting to do this?

Thankfully, the core setting of D&D is the multiverse, with its multitude of worlds. We can tell so many different stories, with different perspectives, in each world. And when we return to a world like FR, stories can evolve. In short, even the older worlds can improve.


@SlyFlourish I could see gnolls being treated differently in other worlds, particularly when they’re a playable race. The idea that they’re spawned hyenas who fed on demon-touched rotten meat feels like they’re in a different class than drow, orcs, goblins and the like. Same with minotaurs.

Internally, we feel that the gnolls in the MM are mistyped. Given their story, they should be fiends, not humanoids. In contrast, the gnolls of Eberron are humanoids, a people with moral and cultural expansiveness.


@MikeyMan1066 I agree. Any creature with the Humanoid type should have the full capacity to be any alignmnet, i.e., they should have free will and souls. Gnolls... the way they are described, do not. Having them be minor demons would clear a lot of this up.

You just described our team's perspective exactly.


As a side-note, the term 'race' is starting to fall out of favor in tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder has "ancestry", and other games use terms like "heritage"); while he doesn't comment on that specifically, he doesn't use the word 'race' and instead refers to 'folks' and 'peoples'.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Eyes of Nine

Everything's Fine
Yup. Finding inspiration in real world cultures is not wrong. It's when you associate that real world culture with something negative that it becomes problematic.

Scottish dwarves are fine.

Miserly Scottish dwarves are not.
I will say that one miserly scottish dwarf is almost ok-ish (although plays up to a negative stereotype about the Scottish). But painting them all as miserly is definitely not ok.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

It is always fun being chastised by a stranger on the internet ;-). Anyhow, I'm sorry that you feel like I'm being dismissive, but that may be because you interpret disagreement as dismissal. I get it, because I don't think you are really considering what I am saying and are just lumping me in with a group of people that you find objectionable ("they").

I can only re-iterate what I've already said, that there is far more nuance and variation of perspectives than you acknowledge, and in terms of discourse, if someone disagrees with you it doesn't mean that they are dismissing what you are saying. Disagreement is simply saying, "Yeah, I don't see it that way, and here's why." Which I did, repeatedly, but you didn't really engage with most of what I've said.

I've repeatedly stated that I think there are real concerns, but I just don't see them in the same way that you do and think there are better ways to approach the matter that both preserve the heritage of the game, while also making it more inclusive.
Making friends from other cultures. Would be good.
 


Why are you making this personal? Do you know anything about me, who my friends are? Let's keep it to the issues and ideas, not speculative statements about who other people are IRL.
Point is it will mean trying understand different viewpoints. We can all do it. I need to do more of it.
 


Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
Scottish dwarves are fine.

Miserly Scottish dwarves are not.
I don't really agree with this. Frost Giants are based off of Vikings, and I'm descended from them, and I don't get offended with their depictions as stupid, evil, enslavers.

If dwarves' depictions are offensive in some way, change that, but I don't really see how it is.
 


Urriak Uruk

Gaming is fun, and fun is for everyone
Honestly curious: who is tying orcs to any ethnic group? I'm not talking about the Tolkien letter, which I don't think is all that relevant, nor am I talking about the connection drawn by a guy on twitter to racist stereotypes, which is him making the connection. Those are pejorative words that multiple cultures have used to speak of other cultures. Unfortunately that sort of racism has existed for thousands of years, and isn't the sole purview of any particular group. But is there any published D&D work or passage that you feel clearly ties orcs to a real ethnic group?

This isn't D&D, but that terrible movie Bright went ahead and did this;

1592635060161.png


In D&D orcs are made as a tribal, raiding group. I wouldn't say there is a specific ethnic group analogy, but they are considered the "barbarians at the gates" of the European-inspired Sword Coast. Which inevitably makes the orcs stand-ins for the "not-Europeans," meaning indigenous tribes, mongols, Africans, whatever.
 

Sadras

Legend
Greeks are not so "white". The region has roughly about 25% yDNA from "black" Africa. Archeologists are still trying to piece together how this happened.

Please link your source for this.
I'm aware of the ancient Minoan and the Mycenean people more than likely having mixed or come from the East (Anatolia and the Caucasus/Iran areas) - which makes sense given the migration people.
 
Last edited:

CleverNickName

Limit Break Dancing
I'm not sure why you need proof, but a cursory Google search will give you all kinds of links. Here's the Wikipedia page. Scroll down to the bottom of it, and there are more than 80 links.

Again, I don't know why you want/need to "prove" how "white" Greeks are. This conversation is heading into creepy eugenics territory, and that means I'm out.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Latest threads

Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Top