glass
(he, him)
Using "objectively" and "literally" a lot does not make things you say actually objective or literal (or true). Power in 4e include martial powers, which are explicitly described as non-magical. Spells have always been decribed as magical. Ergo, Powers != spells. QED.
And yes, I do consider edition warring wrongbadfun. Not going to apologise for that.
_
glass.
You did not say similar to spells. You said everybody, even Slayer Fighters, literally had spells. That is ridiculous on its face. And @doctorbadwolf was responding to your saying that, not the other way around, so you do not get to blame them for the hole you've dug yourself.Being able to bend reality to do supernatural acts is in fact how spells have been defined in other editions. So you're wrong on that as well. I'm also not edition warring at all. I've said that if people view 4e powers as not magical at all, that's fine. I have no issues with how 4e fans play or view the game. As I've repeated, my issue is with DBW calling others who do view powers similar to spells as being badwrong, ridiculous, and worthy of mockery. I haven't said anything remotely disparaging about 4e, so no edition warring. I've only pointed to how 4e defines things itself, and say how some people view powers as similar to spells.
And yes, I do consider edition warring wrongbadfun. Not going to apologise for that.
I never insulted you personally, I pointed out that something you said was untrue. Because it was. Then you doubled down, so I called you on that too.Ironically, you're basically arguing that 4e fans should be able to insult other people who don't view 4e in the same way as they do. So great job with that.
_
glass.