D&D 5E Cloak of Elvenkind - Advantage to Stealth AND -5 to passive perception?

[Iry]

No, if they're invisible to you, perception checks to see them automatically fail.

If you're not trying to see them, then of course perception checks to see them automatically fail.

 

[Asisreo]

Only checks made to SEE you. Such perception checks are quite rare.

If you're invisible or hiding behind total cover (or in total obscurement) there is no disadvantage.

Well, you can't hide from a creature that can clearly see you. Actually, being under dim light a couple hundred feet away with a dark cloak could probably count.

Actually, any form of obscurement could be considered not allowing the character to "see you clearly" as seeing a silhouette doesn't mean I clearly see the person (although if its an obvious silhouette than I'd say they count as being discovered).

 

[Flamestrike]

Well, you can't hide from a creature that can clearly see you.

Yeah, but in most cases when hidden, it's possible to see you (and signs of your passage such as footprints, your shadow, or moving grass etc).

Hiding behind a bush or tree and peering around or out for example.

Actually, any form of obscurement could be considered not allowing the character to "see you clearly"

No - only Skulkers and Wood Elves can hide in light obscurement. You generally need a specific rule to enable it.

Generally everyone else needs total obscurement, or total or near total cover.

That's the thing with the cloak. It's disadvantage on checks to SEE you, but when you're already hidden, you generally cant really be seen anyway.

Taking the Search action to locate an Invisible creature (cloak or no cloak) does not impose disadvantage on the Perception check (because you cant see them).

Ergo it would be plainly stupid to impose disadvantage on a Perception check to search for a non invisible creature who is hiding with the Cloak.

It perversely makes the visible creature harder to spot than the invisible one.

 

[Flamestrike]

If you're not trying to see them, then of course perception checks to see them automatically fail.

Think it through for a second.

Bob, Rogue 3 (Stealth +7) has a Cloak of Elvenkind, and is engaged in battle with Terry, the perceptive Fighter 3 (Perception +5, Passive 15)

Example 1:

On Bobs turn, he drinks a potion of invisibility as an Action, and then takes the Hide action (he can do this at any time, thanks to being invisible) as a Bonus Action (rolling his Stealth with Advantage thanks to the Cloak). He scores a result of 20 successfully hiding from Terry, then slinks away 30' with his movement.

His opponent Terry then takes the Search action on his turn to locate Bob. His Perception check is NOT at disadvantage because he cant SEE Bob. He rolls a total result of 21 and notices the long grass they are fighting in being pushed aside by Bob as he moves, giving away Bobs position.

He Action surges (gaining another Action) and shoots his longbow at Bob (at disadvantage due to invisibility) once and misses.

Example 2:

On Bobs turn, he fires his bow at Terry (and misses) with his Action, and then ducks down into the long grass they are fighting in, and takes the Hide action as a Bonus Action (rolling his Stealth with Advantage thanks to the Cloak). He scores a result of 20 successfully hiding from Terry, then slinks away under the cover of the grass 30' with his movement.

His opponent Terry then takes the Search action on his turn to locate Bob. His Perception check is NOT at disadvantage because he still cant SEE Bob, and even if it WERE possible to see Bob in the grass, Terry is relying on other senses in addition to sight.

He rolls a total result of 19 and fails to locate Bob in the grass. He backs off with his movement, and uses his Bonus action to Second wind and recover hit points.
-----
In a nutshell the Stealth bonus of the cloak is available at all times.

The Perception penalty it confers is much more circumstantial, as generally when you're Hiding (using Stealth) you cant be seen anyway, and even when you are, the Searcher is relying on other senses to locate you in addition to sight.

 

[Iry]

His Perception check is NOT at disadvantage because he cant SEE Bob.

His Perception check is NOT at disadvantage because he still cant SEE Bob, and even if it WERE possible to see Bob in the grass, Terry is relying on other senses in addition to sight.

Terry should roll his perception checks with disadvantage. His normal range of senses are being handicapped, either by the invisibility itself or the magic of the cloak.

You can always see people in line of sight (unless they are invisible). Heavily obscured and total cover imposes blinded/invisible. So the primary situation is going to be people who Hide in heavy obscure / total cover and then move into light obscure, or quickly attempt to attack you. You are saying they would not get disadvantage to perception in those situations, which would mean that feature of the cloak never works.

And while I often disagree with Crawford on several issues, we are in agreement on this one.

 

[Flamestrike]

Terry should roll his perception checks with disadvantage. His normal range of senses are being handicapped, either by the invisibility itself or the magic of the cloak.

In your own houserules perhaps, but that's not the rules.

A hidden creature is always unable to be seen clearly, whether they're invisible or otherwise. The definition of hidden in the PHB is 'unseen AND unheard' and you are unable to even attempt to Hide unless you cant be seen clearly by anyone when you make the attempt.

If you ARE able to see them clearly, they are not hidden, and you dont need to make a Perception check at all (and they cant make a Stealth check to Hide either).

There is no disadvantage to a Perception check to Search for a hidden creature, whether they're hidden behind a tree, in the radius of a Darkness spell, or in the obscurement provided by the invisibility spell.

In your games, you can feel free to impose disadvantage on Perception checks to notice a hidden creature that is undetectable by 1 or more senses (cant be seen, cant be heard etc) but that translates to EVERY single perception check made to detect a Hidden creature seeing as the very definition of [hidden] is [unseen and unheard].

 

[Flamestrike]

You can always see people in line of sight (unless they are invisible). Heavily obscured and total cover imposes blinded/invisible. So the primary situation is going to be people who Hide in heavy obscure / total cover and then move into light obscure

People who do that reveal themselves immediately on leaving the cover/ total obscurement.

Unless the DM rules otherwise, or they have some kind of special ability that lets them (Mask of the Wild, Skulker etc).

 

[Flamestrike]

@Iry

Whats leading you into error is you're assuming people can Hide in light obscurement (or remain Hidden in light obscurement).

You can't Hide (or remain hidden) in light obscurement unless you're a Wood Elf or a Skulker, or a Shadow Demon or similar.

You're asserting:
Total cover/ obscurement = disadvantage on perception to find you if you're hidden, can attempt to Hide
Partial cover/ light obscurement = can attempt to hide, no disadvantage on perception to find you

When its:
Total cover/ obscurement = can attempt to Hide, no disadvantage on perception to find you
Partial cover/ light obscurement = you cant attempt to hide unless a special rule lets you or the DM says so, and if you're already hidden you're not anymore

 

[Charlaquin]

Think it through for a second.

Bob, Rogue 3 (Stealth +7) has a Cloak of Elvenkind, and is engaged in battle with Terry, the perceptive Fighter 3 (Perception +5, Passive 15)

Example 1:

On Bobs turn, he drinks a potion of invisibility as an Action, and then takes the Hide action (he can do this at any time, thanks to being invisible) as a Bonus Action (rolling his Stealth with Advantage thanks to the Cloak). He scores a result of 20 successfully hiding from Terry, then slinks away 30' with his movement.

His opponent Terry then takes the Search action on his turn to locate Bob. His Perception check is NOT at disadvantage because he cant SEE Bob. He rolls a total result of 21 and notices the long grass they are fighting in being pushed aside by Bob as he moves, giving away Bobs position.

He Action surges (gaining another Action) and shoots his longbow at Bob (at disadvantage due to invisibility) once and misses.

Example 2:

On Bobs turn, he fires his bow at Terry (and misses) with his Action, and then ducks down into the long grass they are fighting in, and takes the Hide action as a Bonus Action (rolling his Stealth with Advantage thanks to the Cloak). He scores a result of 20 successfully hiding from Terry, then slinks away under the cover of the grass 30' with his movement.

His opponent Terry then takes the Search action on his turn to locate Bob. His Perception check is NOT at disadvantage because he still cant SEE Bob, and even if it WERE possible to see Bob in the grass, Terry is relying on other senses in addition to sight.

He rolls a total result of 19 and fails to locate Bob in the grass. He backs off with his movement, and uses his Bonus action to Second wind and recover hit points.
-----
In a nutshell the Stealth bonus of the cloak is available at all times.

The Perception penalty it confers is much more circumstantial, as generally when you're Hiding (using Stealth) you cant be seen anyway, and even when you are, the Searcher is relying on other senses to locate you in addition to sight.

Your logic seems sound, but could you provide an example of a situation where Bob’s cloak does impose disadvantage on Terry’s perception check? Cause I find it difficult to picture such a situation under this interpretation.

 

[Iry]

A hidden creature is always unable to be seen clearly, whether they're invisible or otherwise. The definition of hidden in the PHB is 'unseen AND unheard' and you are unable to even attempt to Hide unless you cant be seen clearly by anyone when you make the attempt.

If you ARE able to see them clearly, they are not hidden, and you dont need to make a Perception check at all (and they cant make a Stealth check to Hide either).

I completely agree with you so far.

There is no disadvantage to a Perception check to Search for a hidden creature, whether they're hidden behind a tree, in the radius of a Darkness spell, or in the obscurement provided by the invisibility spell.

I disagree with this. There are a variety of situations where you might suffer disadvantage to a Perception check, including the text of Cloak of Elvenkind.

Whats leading you into error is you're assuming people can Hide in light obscurement (or remain Hidden in light obscurement).
You can't Hide (or remain hidden) in light obscurement unless you're a Wood Elf or a Skulker, or a Shadow Demon or similar.

You cannot Hide in light obscurement. You can remain hidden in light obscurement. You are revealed in no obscurement.

You're asserting:
Total cover/ obscurement = disadvantage on perception to find you if you're hidden, can attempt to Hide
Partial cover/ light obscurement = can attempt to hide, no disadvantage on perception to find you

Total Cover/Obscurement = Possible disadvantage on perception checks to find you, depending on circumstances. Can attempt to hide.
Partial Cover/Light Obscurement = Cannot attempt to hide. Can remain hidden if you successfully hide in Total Cover/Obscurement earlier. Possibly disadvantage on perception checks to find you, depending on circumstances.

PHB Page 177. "You can’t hide from a creature that can see you clearly, and if you make noise (such as shouting a warning or knocking over a vase), you give away your position."

So we know Hide immediately ends when you can be seen clearly (no cover/obscurement). We also know that you can only Hide when you cannot be seen at all (total cover/heavy obscurement). But a successful hide in total cover/heavy obscurement does not end when you move into partial cover/light obscurement. A perception check is called for, though.