Bedrockgames
I post in the voice of Christopher Walken
I think you're underselling the page count associated with your use of equivocation.
I was just guessing at the number of pages. I have no idea how many pages it has been
I think you're underselling the page count associated with your use of equivocation.
You used the word equitation twice in successive posts. It means what I said it means. I'm guessing that's not what you meant..?????
Nope, you can't claim honest opinion as a defense. You've made a statement of fact -- people are using "the fiction" to equivocate, specifically to sneak in "novel writing" for the make-believe results of play. This is not an opinion, it is a claimed statement of fact.I am just giving my honest opinion Omnomancer. You guys are the ones who have spent nearly ten pages of the thread going after me over this one little point.
You used the word equitation twice in successive posts. It means what I said it means. I'm guessing that's not what you meant..
OK, I thought as much. It just struck me as odd. As you were sir.I was typing on a phone so it was likely autocorrect or a misspelling on my part
Nope, you can't claim honest opinion as a defense. You've made a statement of fact -- people are using "the fiction" to equivocate, specifically to sneak in "novel writing" for the make-believe results of play. This is not an opinion, it is a claimed statement of fact.
That it's unnamed people and that they seem to intend to do this makes this seem very much like conspiratorial ideation, and that's not healthy, man.
It's not an opinion if you're making statements of fact. Otherwise, you're saying that you imagine people have been equivocating with "the fiction" in other threads and you imagine it happens elsewhere you haven't seen. Is this your statement -- that you have an active imagination and imagine these things? If so, okay, your opinion. Quite a silly one, but we can put it safely to bed as just some active imagination.I have stated what I think and believe to be the case. It is an opinion. It could be wrong. I am not going to dig through an old thread though over it. I am content to just go by my memory.
It's not an opinion if you're making statements of fact. Otherwise, you're saying that you imagine people have been equivocating with "the fiction" in other threads and you imagine it happens elsewhere you haven't seen. Is this your statement -- that you have an active imagination and imagine these things? If so, okay, your opinion. Quite a silly one, but we can put it safely to bed as just some active imagination.
No, you're again using words incorrectly. Facts cannot be your opinion. They exist or do not. You may have opinions about facts, but you can't say a thing is a fact and also your opinion -- this is a category error. You are saying that you think a thing exists, but this is an act of imagination, not of fact. Saying that it's your opinion that such equivocations as have been discussed exist is you imagining that they do. If this is the case, as I said, we can easily put this to bed as your imagination of bad things. No further need to argue.I am not infallible. I am making statements I believe to be factual, but they are clearly my opinions. For example whether someone equivocated is going to be a debatable thing. I think equivocation arose in those threads. But that is my opinion because I could very well be incorrect.