D&D 5E What of the already done settings do you think WotC is revisiting for a Setting Book?

[darjr]

I think it’s Exandria.

 

[Marc_C]

Forgotten Realms expanded.

 

[Vaalingrade]

I want Eberron, but it's going to be FR. It's always F'n FR.

 

[Bitbrain]

Reply to OP.

I expect it to be either Exandria or Forgotten Realms, neither of which I care for.

I hope it is Greyhawk, but am not expecting it to be such.

 

[Marc_C]

Reply to OP.

I expect it to be either Exandria or Forgotten Realms, neither of which I care for.

I hope it is Greyhawk, but am not expecting it to be such.

I would love Greyhawk but doubt it. Don't think it qualifies for a setting already visited. Saltmarsh was more an adventure. On the other hand it qualifies for the Old Settings they are working on.

 

[Urriak Uruk]

Yeah it really isn't in motion at all, yet. And it wasn't biased, I simply forgot Exandia.

And no Greyhawk doesn't count, it's got kind of an adventure, but it has no setting book. I'll add Exandia if I still can, but not Greyhawk.

Biased poll is biased. Winninger's tweet didn't say revisiting settings that already have setting books, it just said revisiting settings.

GREYHAWK OR BUST

Edit: You also spelt Exandria incorrectly.

 

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

I want Eberron, but it's going to be FR. It's always F'n FR.

Always the way to bet.

 

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

Also, a lot of you don't seem to know what "bias" is.

 

[Undrave]

The SCAG is pretty much the most outdated books in 5e and more people have no reason to buy it. A new FR campaign guide would make sense.

 

[Ruin Explorer]

I my mind it's 50/50 between the FR and Exandria. Very valid reasons for both/either.