Crimson Longinus
Legend
They were both.Also... they were hobbits, not halflings.
They were both.Also... they were hobbits, not halflings.
snobbish no pessimistic depressed how they break people into a form but never seek to really fix them plus I am in the UK ideas are dead as dodos where I have situated no idea about the rest of the nation.I don’t know what nation you are from. But you seem to have alot of hate for the military or at least a condescending snotty snobbish attitude towards them. But in America. The vast majority of us enlisted out of love for our country, belief in liberty, and our constitution.
the truest statement in this thread, halfling were made to be hobbits.A difference without any meaning whatsoever.
D&D artificers tend to make things that go boom. Halflings have good chefs and carpenters, yes, but probably relatively few artificers.You think that artificers don't create greater comfort? Build a better bed, make a nicer meal? If comfort is the driver I'd expect more not fewer artificers.
That's because the claim that's the only way to experience those traits was entirely and completely a strawman you invented. And that you are doubling down on this strawman right here is the main reason I think you are posting in good faith. No one would post that obvious and embarrassing a strawman if they weren't serious.These are all personality traits. Supposedly you play halflings because they are the only way to expeirence these traits. My response to Steeldragon was... no. Any race can have these traits, saying that being against halflings is being against these traits is wrong, because these traits extend beyond halflings.
You then laughed at me, rolled your eyes at me, and procceeded to tell me I am wrong, because I'm not reading the posts?
The way you keep posting strawmen and denying the experience of others and the advice of others in favour of your really really boring take on halflings is making it hard to care. You may have a heart of gold, but so does a hard boiled egg.The fact that you are getting pissed off might be making it hard for you to see that no malice was intended.
And when we tell you things you just say you've never seen them.Above you just said no. That doesn't tell me anything.
As I have pointed out halfings are the more popular race of the two and the thematics of gnomes are frequently self defeating. If one of the two goes it's the gnomes that belong on the chopping block. Halflings can thematically do just about anything their less popular cousins with a more messed up identity can - but gnomes lack the expectation of being over matched and can only reinforce about half the Halfling traits.Between humans and gnomes, halflings don't feel like they have any ground left to them. And I feel like gnomes have the stronger identity to build off of for the future.
Until you stop starting with blatant strawmen?And how do you know that? You seem very secure in your knowledge that the problem is that I'm ignoring things, yet all you do is tell me to read it again. How many times should I reread the materials I have until you are satisfied that I'm actually reading them and not just dismissing them? Until I agree with you?
This is a problem? Variation and nuance - while playing up the Halfling fragility by putting them side by side with dinosaurs.That's the disconnect. Genetically they are the same, but culturally they seem to be incredibly different.
And drow are different to wood elves.Heck, it even states in the halfling description in the book that the halflings that spread across Khorvaire ended up looking and acting like humans "but their cousins in the Talenta plains couldn't be more different".
D&D artificers tend to make things that go boom. Halflings have good chefs and carpenters, yes, but probably relatively few artificers.
D&D artificers make things. Adventurers make things go boom. Adventuring artificers tend to make things that go boom.D&D artificers tend to make things that go boom. Halflings have good chefs and carpenters, yes, but probably relatively few artificers.
No one but you thinks this, as far as I can tell.Supposedly you play halflings because they are the only way to expeirence these traits.
Ted Sandyman is the miller in Hobbiton, thoroughly insular and small-minded. He later collaborates with Sharkey's men when they take over the Shire.No idea who sandyman is at all.
Hope you enjoy where you are at and never come to my country. Best luck to you.snobbish no pessimistic depressed how they break people into a form but never seek to really fix them plus I am in the UK ideas are dead as dodos where I have situated no idea about the rest of the nation.
I have no dislike of military personal in general, but I know all nations are rotten, that liberty is a far more complex topic than people think and dying for a piece of paper is utterly mad but I resect those who would fight for their ideals.
the truest statement in this thread, halfling were made to be hobbits.
Likewise, the Sackville-Baggins family were more than just resentful of Bilbo's wealth; they actually collaborated with Saruman during his occupation of the Shire in order to take control of Bag End.Ted Sandyman is the miller in Hobbiton, thoroughly insular and small-minded. He later collaborates with Sharkey's men when they take over the Shire.
![]()
Ted Sandyman
Ted Sandyman was a Hobbit allied with the Chief's Men during the War of the Ring. Ted Sandyman was the son of Sandyman the Miller of Hobbiton. One evening in early April of 3018, Ted Sandyman was at The Green Dragon Inn with Sam Gamgee, the gardener at Bag End. Sam talked about strange things...lotr.fandom.com