D&D 5E The October D&D Book is Fizban’s Treasury of Dragons

As revealed by Nerd Immersion by deciphering computer code from D&D Beyond!

Fizban the Fabulous is, of course, the accident-prone, befuddled alter-ego of Dragonlance’s god of good dragons, Paladine, the platinum dragon (Dragonlance’s version of Bahamut).

Which makes my guess earlier this year spot on!

UPDATE -- the book now has a description!



2E56D87C-A6D8-4079-A3B5-132567350A63.png




EEA82AF0-58EA-457E-B1CA-9CD5DCDF4035.jpeg

Fizban the Fabulous by Vera Gentinetta
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad


This alignment conversation has me a bit bummed. If they don't have alignment in Fizban's for the monsters, I'm not going to buy it. And I doubt that it will be there.
I like moral absolutes in my D&D, as a relief and contrast to real world social constructivism and shades of gray.

As an old grog I won't need written alignment to make that happen, even if I like it as an easy guideline.

But it sure would be strange if the ancient red Kraz'dergaz, terror of the north, might as easily be Kraz'dergaz, protector of the north, who fly to your village because she got a hankering for tea, scones and gossip with the village elders.

For me it would be detrimental to the game for dragons to lose alignment and dissolve the chromatic/metallic dichotomy.

I will still buy Fizban's cause hey, it's a 5e book of dragons. But my chromatics will still be evil aligned.
 

This alignment conversation has me a bit bummed. If they don't have alignment in Fizban's for the monsters, I'm not going to buy it. And I doubt that it will be there.
That seems a fairly minor thing to be the deciding factor. I would prefer to see alignment in the stat blocks as well (maybe with the old 2e modifiers like "often" or "usually"), but the lack of them is hardly going eclipse all the other expected goodness in the book, in my opinion.
 

I had 3 dragons in my campaign a LN blue dragon, a CG red dragon who loves bathing and a traditional gold dragon based on Matthew Broderick's character from Ladyhawke!
I still think he's LG, but not THAT Lawful Good!
Consider Matthau a work in progress I'm inclined to change him to NG instead, but I doubt that will get any further than it has.
 


How about just not killing them? Or take the Gygax approach and exterminate the evil children? Most species have young, why is it so surprising that yeti do?
I wouldn't have them kill a bunch of owl bear cubs either. It was simply easier and more palatable at my table to eliminate the question entirely.
 

In Neverwinter you have an option to gain one to act as your companion in that game.
Takes some doing mind you.
I'm surprised there's no mention of druid's groves or Ranger organisations that could be contacted to help with that.
As for goblin children has anyone tried creating an actual society not based on the Pathfinder version?
 



Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top