D&D General Survivor Dungeon Masters -- discussion

CleverNickName

Limit Break Dancing
... Do none of y'all have situations where you need to roll something but don't want the players to know what it is and how you rolled?
Yeah, every now and then. (Sometimes the rules require it, such as with the Augury spell.)

Most often though, I'll just roll the dice anyway, out in the open, and not declare a reason. It's amusing to watch the players exchange looks, trying to figure out what I was rolling and whether the result is good or bad (or just me messin' with them.) I don't do it frequently, but when I do it looks like this.

ME: Okay, you open the door to the chamber, and peer inside. You see a small table with a lit candle on it, dimly lighting the papers and quill pen sitting upon it. (quietly rolls a d20, gets a 5, and sets it aside) The candle flickers from the draft of the now-open door. What does everyone want to do?​
PLAYERS: (nervously exchange looks) Um.​

They don't know that the reason I was rolling was to see if the draft from the door would blow out the candle. Their imaginations are going nuts, trying to decide if I was rolling for a random encounter, a monster's Stealth check, or just to build tension.

Like I said, I don't do this constantly. But I do it often enough that me rolling dice "for no reason" is something they are accustomed to, and something that they've learned not to over-think. So it just happens in the background, and the players only take note if something immediately happen afterward or I roll a nat20 or something.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


CleverNickName

Limit Break Dancing
Wowserz.

So a discussion about the best of the survivor DMs of fame and infamy… boils down to who fudges dice and who doesn’t.

Who knew it was so simple!
Oh that's just the flavor of the week. I'm sure we will move on to even more pressing matters, like whether or not a DM uses a battle mat.

Or whether or not they are "on the internet."
 
Last edited:


RoughCoronet0

Dragon Lover
Oh that's just the flavor of the week. I'm sure we will move on to even more pressing matters, like whether or not a DM uses a battle mat.
I enjoy games with battle maps, as I’m a very visually oriented person. It’s much easier for me to immerse myself in something if I have something visual to focus on. It’s why I prefer to watch livestreams of games then just listen to a podcast, and why I tend to enjoy music videos or even just lyric videos over simply listening to something over a radio.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. It’s not next week yet! ;)
 

TheSword

Legend
I enjoy games with battle maps, as I’m a very visually oriented person. It’s much easier for me to immerse myself in something if I have something visual to focus on. It’s why I prefer to watch livestreams of games then just listen to a podcast, and why I tend to enjoy music videos or even just lyric videos over simply listening to something over a radio.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. It’s not next week yet! ;)
Me too. But it don’t think use of the them or lack of use determines whether someone is a great DM or not.
 



CleverNickName

Limit Break Dancing
Me too. But it don’t think use of the them or lack of use determines whether someone is a great DM or not.
I think it's my fault.

We arrived on this topic when folks were discussing the DM style of Matt Colville, and @Malmuria mentioned that they didn't like Matt's style of running the game...specifically, how Matt "fudges die rolls to make encounters more dramatic, pretends that their improvisation is actually something written down in their notes."

It made me curious about how many DMs also do that, so I asked the question, and down the rabbit hole we went. I didn't know it was such a hotly-contested issue, or that it was so closely linked to the 'railroading' boilerplate.
 
Last edited:


Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Top