D&D General Critical Role: Overrated, Underrated, or Goldilocks?

[Norton]

As a performer and player of D&D who is a huge fan of CR, what I see that makes the show notable beyond all things that make D&D notable is the energy put into each game by the players, and how that energy is generated by their being performers first, and there being an audience second.

This is an attendant energy that is second nature for performers, so seeing it replicated in their home games isn't a surprise. They are also trained to tap into it, master a TV face, let situations breathe, not step on each other's lines, see an opening for a setup, tie a conversation in a bow, etc. That's what makes it extra entertaining for many beyond the Xs and Os of the game (apologies for the sports analogy). They just happen to have so many synergistic elements so well under control with a crack production team, and that is mostly a testament to Mercer who is authentic in his passion for the game and supremely gifted in all the right ways to play it.

 

[Oofta]

I would say no. No more than Arin Hansen and Dan Avidan playing video games off camera is Game Grumps.

So if a band is doing a practice session they are no longer a band?

 

[Charlaquin]

So if a band is doing a practice session they are no longer a band?

No, don’t be silly. They’re a band doing a practice session. As opposed to a band doing a concert.

 

[Oofta]

No, don’t be silly. They’re a band doing a practice session. As opposed to a band doing a concert.

But the CR cast playing the game would ... not be CR? Or if a band was just having a jam session for fun?

EDIT: I don't really care at this point, we have different opinions. Just curious.

 

[Charlaquin]

But the CR cast playing the game would ... not be CR? Or if a band was just having a jam session for fun?

EDIT: I don't really care at this point, we have different opinions. Just curious.

Critical Role is the name of the show, not the group. Blink 182 is still Blink 182 when they’re rehearsing or even just jamming together, they just aren’t doing Warped Tour when they do that. Likewise, the cast of Critical Role is still the cast of Critical Role when playing a D&D session together off the show, they just aren’t doing Critical Role.

 

[Norton]

I wanted to add something before the thread fizzled. CR has a meta thing going for it that is very on brand for the ttrpg community: these guys are real friends that genuinely love each other. Sentimental perhaps, but I catch myself getting a bit seduced by their organic, tight-knit group almost as much as their play.

 

[BookTenTiger]

If the CR crew turns off the stream, sends home the extras (production crew) and still plays the game. Same play styles, behavior.

Is it still Critical Role?

If one by one the cast of Critical Role were replaced by other voice actors / D&D players, and all the crew were also slowly, one by one, replaced, would it still be the Ship of Theseus? Er, I mean, Critical Role?

 

[Scribe]

If one by one the cast of Critical Role were replaced by other voice actors / D&D players, and all the crew were also slowly, one by one, replaced, would it still be the Ship of Theseus? Er, I mean, Critical Role?

I'd say no.

 

[Iry]

The Critical Role cast isn’t just leveraging acting chops to maintain better pacing. They are putting on a performance. It’s just not the same activity as playing D&D casually, the same as dancing at the club is a different activity than doing an improvised dance performance for an audience. The point of making this distinction, as stated in the opening post and reiterated many times in this thread, is to recognize the incredible skill that goes into making their performance look as natural as if it were a home game, and to emphasize that if you want to emulate them, you should keep in mind that their performance has different needs and concerns than your home game, so you might need to make some changes to adapt to the needs of your game.

I'm sure there are many D&D groups that don't put any emphasis on the performance element, but I find the performance element abundant in D&D games in general. If your goal is to acknowledge that they have/use many skills that contribute to making the show enjoyable to an audience? Yes, I agree absolutely! But if you're suggesting many groups DON'T perform for each other on the regular, I think you're wrong.

 

[Charlaquin]

I'm sure there are many D&D groups that don't put any emphasis on the performance element, but I find the performance element abundant in D&D games in general. If your goal is to acknowledge that they have/use many skills that contribute to making the show enjoyable to an audience? Yes, I agree absolutely! But if you're suggesting many groups DON'T perform for each other on the regular, I think you're wrong.

Again, there is a difference between performing for an “audience” that consists entirely of active participants in the performance, and performing for an audience of passive observers. A bunch of jazz players having an improvisational jam session together, and the same people doing an improvisational concert are two different activities.