overgeeked
Open-World Sandbox
And optimizers treat each other like Einstein if they manage to wring so much as a +1 out of the system.2) This is a fandom that rallied around avoiding adding 2 to a number.
And optimizers treat each other like Einstein if they manage to wring so much as a +1 out of the system.2) This is a fandom that rallied around avoiding adding 2 to a number.
Whole essay's have been written on the importance, or meaninglessness, of a single +1 in 5e.And optimizers treat each other like Einstein if they manage to wring so much as a +1 out of the system.
Exactly. It’s an easy 3rd-grade math problem, guys. Don’t break your arms patting yourselves on the back.Whole essay's have been written on the importance, or meaninglessness, of a single +1 in 5e.![]()
Except it is. See..I'm just going to point out that:
1) You are the third person to try to explain THAC0 as if it were easy in a third entirely different way and it still doesn't sound as simple as roll plus bonus, compare to DC.
I'm not sure what that alludes to...but I'll assume it's funny.2) This is a fandom that rallied around avoiding adding 2 to a number.
Burn the heretic!!!! Thou shalt not dis Sir Pterry.I tend to not like humor in my fantasy/sci-fi (but I do love comedy in my horror). So "yes" to Ghostbusters, but "no" to Terry Pratchett or Douglas Adams. This might be a reason I don't like fey as a theme in general - too goofy.
The math works out the same in the end, but the suggested procedure is more complex:The joke makes me shrug, but I do find it a little disingenuous when people treat THAC0 as some sort of brain-bending mathbomination. It's literally the same mechanic y'all are still using now, only instead of 1d20 + AC ≥ THAC0, you roll attacks with 1d20 + Attack ≥ AC. Wow-wee, what a super-intuitive and revolutionary innovation.
Dude, have your read any of Piers Anthony's Xanth novels? You would absolutely love them!I tend to not like humor in my fantasy/sci-fi (but I do love comedy in my horror). So "yes" to Ghostbusters, but "no" to Terry Pratchett or Douglas Adams. This might be a reason I don't like fey as a theme in general - too goofy.
And optimizers treat each other like Einstein if they manage to wring so much as a +1 out of the system.
Hang on a moment, not to be the Devil's Advocate, but it really depends on where that +1 is being applied to, doesn't it? If it's to a single damage roll, that's definitely negligible. If it's to an attack roll? That means you're 5% more likely to do damage with that attack! If it's to your AC? That means that you're going to ignore 5% more of the attacks that will be focused on you. If it's on the amount of characters in the party, that's a full other PC that can do an Action, Bonus Action, Movement, and Reaction all in one round! +1's can obviously range from nigh useless to game-breakingly amazing!Whole essay's have been written on the importance, or meaninglessness, of a single +1 in 5e.![]()
Ewww. Piers Anthony writes pedo porn.Dude, have your read any of Piers Anthony's Xanth novels? You would absolutely love them!