D&D 5E Recent Errata clarifications

Scribe

Legend
Not the same thing. You can add those things with less than a snap of your finger as a DM. If you want to make Oathbreaker Paladins all have to be Evil, Devotion Paladins all have to be Lawful Good, Orcs all to be evil, etc, you are free to do that with your DM hat on. It takes more work and justification as a DM to remove that than add on minor restrictions like "no, your Lawful Good Devotion Paladin cannot burn down the Oprhanage and still call themselves good". Having to go through all of the books and remove every instance of alignment-restrictions (which would probably heavily influence class spell lists and racial abilities) to make it what I wanted is more work than just saying "no, Orcs have to be evil in this world".

I'm not saying that it's wrong to like alignment, I'm saying that if that was added to the game in the way you want it, it would almost definitely make me leave the game.
No different than me saying the removal of the things Wizards is removing and the (imo) intent behind those changes is wrong, and you claiming I'm judging what you like yesterday.

No different at all. ;)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Bolares

Hero
This may come as a surprise, but I actually agree with you on that. At least, if it’s going to exist at all. If alignment has no mechanical consequences, it’s just a pointless descriptive tag that causes arguments on the interest and nothing else. Get rid of it, it’s not doing anything useful. Or, make it do something useful. I’d be fine with either solution, but 5e’s current approach of trying to have alignment exist but not matter in any way is the worst of both worlds.
It’s definitely not the worst of both worlds. The more alignment there is the worst it gets! If you like it you are playing wrong! /s
 

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
Probably fair. In the last 6 or so months I've quickly pivotted away from 5e's approach to pretty much everything, maybe it was LevelUp that had me thinking about things differently, maybe it was looking again at PF1 and remembering how things could (should?) be, I dont know.

Ultimately, 5e is not demonstrating the type of depth (it may have its own depth!) that I'm wanting, at all at this point, and the removal of Alignment is the removal of just one more piece of that.
5e definitely does suffer from a lack of depth, yeah (at least in some ways; as you say, maybe it has its own sort of depth, just not the sort I wish it had). That’s the cost of mass appeal though, right?
 

Scribe

Legend
It’s definitely not the worst of both worlds. The more alignment there is the worst it gets! If you like it you are playing wrong! /s
Oh Brother Reaction GIF by reactionseditor

5e definitely does suffer from a lack of depth, yeah (at least in some ways; as you say, maybe it has its own sort of depth, just not the sort I wish it had). That’s the cost of mass appeal though, right?

Exactly, 100%. It just is what it is, and I get it.
 






Bolares

Hero
Not quite! I've probably lost a good few years due to covid preventing me from being in the shape I was pre-covid locks, but...I've got a few miles to go before I rest. ;)
Oooh, keel over means die? I thought it meant something like getting a hump (is hump the word?) or something like that.
 

Remove ads

Top