D&D General Hasbro activist begins proxy fight, urges Dungeons & Dragons spinoff

beancounter

(I/Me/Mine)
It's always best to have a diversified portfolio, whether you're an individual investing in stocks, or a company holding a variety products or brand names.

The basic idea is that if one part of your portfolio does poorly, you still have others that will keep your ROI from tanking.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Divine2021

Adventurer
This article was posted on the front page of the Wall Street Journal today. Below is a snippet. Could be a v. v. big deal. The implications of this is that if WoTC is spun off another company could buy it. And the only ones really with that kind of market cap are your really big ones. Worth watching this closely.


A little-known activist investor is seeking to add several directors to Hasbro Inc.’s board and is urging the toy maker to make changes including a spinoff of its fast-growing unit housing games such as Dungeons & Dragons.

Alta Fox Capital Management LLC, which has a 2.5% stake in Hasbro worth roughly $325 million, has nominated five directors to its board, according to a letter viewed by The Wall Street Journal that will be sent to the company’s shareholders. Shareholders will vote on director nominees at Hasbro’s annual meeting this spring.

Alta Fox, which says in the letter that it has spoken to Hasbro, noted that the company’s stock price is lower than it was five years ago and has significantly trailed the broader market. Alta Fox believes Hasbro could double its valuation by spinning off the unit that houses the Dungeons & Dragons business.

Hasbro said in a statement it will review Alta Fox’s nominees. It said it is excited to welcome its new chief executive officer, Chris Cocks, who previously led the unit housing Dungeons & Dragons, known as Wizards of the Coast and Digital Gaming.
 

Divine2021

Adventurer
It is worth quoting two more sections:
“Alta Fox estimates in the letter that if the division was separated, it could be worth roughly as much as Hasbro, or $13 billion or more.”

That’s a lot of freaking money.

“The activist takes issue with Hasbro’s capital allocation, including its acquisition of Entertainment One in 2019, and its Brand Blueprint strategy, which focuses on promotion through multimedia storytelling.
 


The activist’s theory (and this is a common one) that the sum of the parts is worth less than two stand alone companies. That WoTC’s valuation is dragged down by the lower numbers for the rest of Hasbro and that without WoTC the rest of Hasbro would be forced to do better.

The Board (and management) owns relatively little stock, Hasbro is broadly owned by the public.

The WSJ article was weird in that it mentioned D&D over and over and only one mention of Magic the Gathering which is a much more popular game.

Hasbro invested quite a lot of their cash flow into media assets the past decade and not as much in growing their core games and toys business. They have generally fumbled digital gaming.

Years ago I bought enough stock so that the dividend would pay for about what I was spending on Magic then. I switched to D&D about 5 years ago (switched back is more accurate) and the stock has more than doubled since I bought it, but it has been very stagnant the past while.

Decent cash flow generation and stock price underperformance often draws activists.
 






Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Upcoming Releases

Top