RPG Evolution: You Can't Just Buy Hasbro

gildedcage.jpg

Picture courtesy of Pixabay.

"How Much is Hasbro?"​

Recent social media chatter has brought the concept of corporate acquisitions into the public eye, with discussions of potential takeovers of major companies swirling online. Now that the idea is out there, it's worth digging into the feasibility of someone buying Hasbro, and thus Wizards of the Coast (the owners of the intellectual property of Dungeons & Dragons).

This isn't the first time the future of WOTC's independence has come up. One of the concerns floated by Wizards of the Coast during the OGL controversy was that a major competitor, like Disney or Meta, could use the Open Game License to potentially create its own Dungeons & Dragons content, thereby edging Hasbro out of its own market. This precipitated the entire OGL debacle, alienating many small press publishers who used the license, as Hasbro's lawyers sought to add safeguards that prevented just such an event from happening.

It turns out buying a company isn't as simple as "paying for it."

How to Buy a Company: A Step-by-Step Guide​

Hasbro is a publicly traded company. Acquiring a publicly traded company is a multifaceted process involving numerous stages and stakeholders. It’s a complex undertaking that requires careful planning, negotiation, and execution.
  • Initial Offer/Expression of Interest: The process typically begins with a formal offer or expression of interest made by the potential acquiring company to the target company's board of directors. This offer outlines the proposed terms of the acquisition, including the price and structure of the deal. This is a far cry from casually mentioning interest on social media.
  • Due Diligence: Once an offer is made, the acquiring company conducts extensive due diligence. This involves a thorough investigation of the target company's financial records, legal standing, business operations, and potential liabilities. Teams of lawyers, accountants, and industry experts meticulously analyze every aspect of the target company to assess its true value and potential risks.
  • Negotiation and Definitive Agreement: If the due diligence is satisfactory, the two companies enter into negotiations to finalize the terms of the acquisition. Once an agreement is reached, a legally binding document called a definitive agreement is signed. This is where the actual cost of acquisition comes into play. As of January 17, 2025, Hasbro's common stock was trading around $57.34 per share. With approximately 139.5 million outstanding shares, Hasbro's market capitalization sat at approximately $8 billion. A potential acquirer might consider acquiring a controlling stake (more than 50% of the shares). To do so, based on the figures above, they would need around $4 billion. However, the act of acquiring a large number of shares itself would likely drive the price up. The cost of acquiring a controlling stake would therefore be significantly higher than the simple calculation based on the current market capitalization.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Depending on the size and nature of the acquisition, regulatory approvals may be required from government agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). They can reject offers that they deem inadequate or not in the best interests of the company.
  • Shareholder Approval: In most cases, the acquisition must be approved by the shareholders of both the acquiring company and the target company. Hasbro has the authorization to issue up to 600 million shares, and according to their latest quarterly report, they have only issued around a third of that total. This means the company can dilute ownership by issuing additional shares, making a hostile takeover even more challenging. The board of directors also plays a vital role in this process, ensuring that any deal is in the best interests of the shareholders.
It's worth noting that there is no "buyout clause" that allows someone to simply purchase a controlling stake on the open market. An offer must be presented to the board.

Very Different Companies​

The most recent parallel to a company swooping in and purchasing another is Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter by X Corp, but there's some significant financial differences between Twitter and Hasbro.

While the sheer price tag of the Twitter acquisition ($44 billion) dwarfs Hasbro's current market capitalization (around $8 billion), this doesn't automatically make Hasbro an easier target. Hasbro is a well-established company with diverse revenue streams derived from toys, games, and entertainment. This diversification provides a buffer against market fluctuations—a stark contrast to Twitter's pre-acquisition reliance on advertising revenue and struggles with profitability. This stability makes Hasbro a less risky investment from a lender's perspective, making it much harder to secure the massive debt needed for a leveraged buyout, a key tactic used in the Twitter acquisition.

Unlike Twitter, Hasbro possesses significant tangible assets, including physical inventory, manufacturing facilities, and valuable intellectual property like Dungeons & Dragons and Magic: The Gathering. These tangible assets can be used as collateral for loans, making traditional financing options more readily available. Twitter's assets, on the other hand, were primarily intangible, consisting of brand recognition, user base, and technology—assets that are harder to value and less appealing as collateral for lenders.

Hasbro's shareholder base is markedly different from Twitter's too. Hasbro boasts a diverse mix of shareholders, including institutional investors who typically hold shares for longer periods and are less likely to be swayed by short-term gains. This contrasts with Twitter's shareholder base, which was likely more focused on immediate returns and thus more receptive to a high buyout offer. Securing the necessary shareholder approval for a Hasbro acquisition would likely be a lot harder.

And Yet..​

Twitter was vulnerable to a takeover because the company wasn't performing (and is still not performing to this day). If Hasbro's stock underperforms long enough for the company to consider a buyout, competitors like Musk, Disney, or Meta could make a play. Even then, it’s not a simple matter of having the money; it requires careful planning, negotiation, and execution. There's also the fact that Twitter lost 55% of its value (from its $44 billion purchase price down to its one year anniversary at $19 billion) after X Corp acquired it, making the appettite for another acquisition like this unlikely.

All that said, it's worth noting that, just like his inquiry into Hasbo, Musk's journey into acquiring Twitter began with four chilling words: "How much is it?"
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Michael Tresca

Michael Tresca

That is called a hostile takeover, and that is why the board has so many preauthorized shares in reserve: it is literally impossible to buy a controlling interest without board approval.
If I have the majority of the shares, how long is that board going to be the board? I might be able to ambush them, and if not, who gets those new shares, the board or the shareholders?

For it to prevent anything those shares would need to go to the board rather than the shareholders
 

log in or register to remove this ad


How to explain it delicately? Elon Musk knows a lot of very important people in the highest spheres. He has got a "group of friends" and this group is rival of other.

Musk, at this point, is in way too deep with other things to give a whit about a company with toys, games, and a little bit of IP. What he does may impact Hasbro, but he's really unlikely to have time to give Hasbro any personal thought.
 

If I have the majority of the shares, how long is that board going to be the board? I might be able to ambush them, and if not, who gets those new shares, the board or the shareholders?

For it to prevent anything those shares would need to go to the board rather than the shareholders
Two thirds of the shares haven't been issued yet, and the board can issue them at their discretion (most likely to themselves). This has been pre-approved precisely so that it is impossible to buy a majority of shares on the open market and own Hasbro, all deals have to be approved by the board.
 

Two thirds of the shares haven't been issued yet, and the board can issue them at their discretion (most likely to themselves). This has been pre-approved precisely so that it is impossible to buy a majority of shares on the open market and own Hasbro, all deals have to be approved by the board.
that's not really an answer though, if during the next shareholder meeting someone with the majority of shares were to not confirm the board, the board would be out. At that point them issuing new shares probably is too late / impossible. That is the ambush.

The more interesting part is the 'most likely to themselves', so the board can just hand themselves 2./3s of Hasbro whenever they 'feel like it' and the current shareholders are ok with that and with losing 2/3s of their investment (the company is not worth more, there are simply three times the number of shares now)? Nice poison pill if that is how it works...
 

that's not really an answer though, if during the next shareholder meeting someone with the majority of shares were to not confirm the board, the board would be out. At that point them issuing new shares probably is too late / impossible. That is the ambush.

The more interesting part is the 'most likely to themselves', so the board can just hand themselves 2./3s of Hasbro whenever they 'feel like it' and the current shareholders are ok with that and with losing 2/3s of their investment (the company is not worth more, there are simply three times the number of shares now)? Nice poison pill if that is how it works...

That's a worst case scenario hostile takeover.

Easier making an offer to the board.

Melon Husk is worlds richest troll. Have a beer and ignore him.
 

If Elon really wants to buy Hasbro, now it would be totally secret and confidential, their lips will be sealed, silent as tombs, to avoid stock market speculations.
Perhaps not Elon, but then I doubt he was ever actually serious - it was most likely a throwaway comment because he was butthurt about the unflattering (but true) things published about Gary Gygax. But, yeah, if someone wanted to buy Hasbro, it would be kept very quiet.

As for the board, they have to work to maximise shareholder value. So if someone did make a sufficiently large offer they would be obliged to at least consider it. So while I don't expect EM to buy Hasbro, I wouldn't be at all surprised if someone did.
 

that's not really an answer though, if during the next shareholder meeting someone with the majority of shares were to not confirm the board, the board would be out. At that point them issuing new shares probably is too late / impossible. That is the ambush.

The more interesting part is the 'most likely to themselves', so the board can just hand themselves 2./3s of Hasbro whenever they 'feel like it' and the current shareholders are ok with that and with losing 2/3s of their investment (the company is not worth more, there are simply three times the number of shares now)? Nice poison pill if that is how it works...
Yes, that is why this is called a poison pill. It makes a hostile takeover literally impossible, so nobody is going to put several billion dollars into a plan that will be poisoned.
 

What people tend to forget is that it's not just about someone buying xyz, but the people currently owning xyz willing to part with it. When you show major interest, the price goes up significantly. Every day around 1.5 million shares of Hasbro stock are traded, even if you bought up all of them, there would be more demand then supply, thus the price goes up. At a certain percentage of stock ownership things need to be disclosed, if it's known you're buying a TON of stock, prices go up. And if Hasbro doesn't want you to get a majority stake in their company, they can start issuing more shares, which requires even more money to acquire.

So you're stuck with making an offer and them accepting, spend tens of billions on a hostile takeover, which doesn't make a sound investment in something like Hasbro (and WotC). If it was, the stock prices would already be higher then they are now. Or you could spend a lot of time (and money) doing it slowly using different companies. None of these scenarios seem likely at the moment. Especially not when someone like EM would try to buy Hasbro/WotC, he's controversial enough for other parties to interfere in any takeover bid, upping the price to non-funny heights... If Bob Smith (generic rich nobody) where to try the same thing, a lot less controversy would ensue. Heck, I think Hasbro/WotC being bought by Disney would be less controversial then EM...

EM is not just controversial due to politics (which we won't discuss here), but also because how he's handled the Twitter takeover, ranging from brand destruction (renaming), to functionality, to actual value of the company. While some might see something like that as a positive happening to Hasbro/WotC, many wouldn't. After EMs tweet on the 22nd of November 2024, stock prices rose by ~10%, the interest in Hasbro/WotC stock lasted for about a week or two before loosing ~10% of the value before the EM tweet. Also keep in mind that Hasbro/WotC stock is currently worth about half what it was worth about 5 years ago...
 

EM is not just controversial due to politics (which we won't discuss here), but also because how he's handled the Twitter takeover, ranging from brand destruction (renaming), to functionality, to actual value of the company. While some might see something like that as a positive happening to Hasbro/WotC, many wouldn't. After EMs tweet on the 22nd of November 2024, stock prices rose by ~10%, the interest in Hasbro/WotC stock lasted for about a week or two before loosing ~10% of the value before the EM tweet. Also keep in mind that Hasbro/WotC stock is currently worth about half what it was worth about 5 years ago...
He also pays people to play video games for him using his account, and then brags about his "achievements". Scummy doesn't even begin to describe it.

How you do one thing in life is how you do everything...
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top