billd91
Not your screen monkey (he/him)
Only the designers can answer that question, but my theory is they did it because they wanted to define all dragons as inflicting some kind of "energy" damage and poison wasn't defined as an energy. The closest to chlorine gas would have been acid.Why did Green Dragons change to acid in 3e and then back to poison gas in 4e without the chlorine? Would the universe have exploded if 4e went sonic?
3e design was driven by systems and structures for everything - hence "system mastery". Making all dragons do energy damage, having energy resistance, having their damaging breath weapons countered by resist energy - all systematic. A DM/Player knowing how one worked, generally knew them all.
Counterparts to their evil, chromatic cousins. Plus, not every monster in the manual is there for heroes to fight, trick, or evade.What's the point of metallic dragons? Why aren't silver ones giant mirrors that shoot lasers (as per @Vaalingrade 's brilliant suggestion)?
I had fun with them. I used them in a 1e game I ran. BTW, it was orange, purple, and yellow.Were the orange, purple, and !?!? dragons ever worth looking at back in Dragon Magazine (iirc?)?
They may have been made too simple for a flagship monster. I'd like some more resistances and interesting powers like the 3e/PF ones.What is your biggest concern about Dragons?