teitan
Legend
By definition fictional history IS meaningless.If you don't treat fictional history seriously, it really is meaningless.
By definition fictional history IS meaningless.If you don't treat fictional history seriously, it really is meaningless.
He is a man of many interests, tis true, UT the Critical Role books are written in a very AD&D style, with dashes of 3E even.He sure does use a lot of 4e lore though don’t he? Lol seamlessly.
I know they're not exactly the same. But they're interchangeable to me in the same way Barqs and A&W root beer are. They both taste slightly different, but I don't particularly care which one you serve me.Which demonstrates ignorance. They aren’t interchangeable at all. Greyhawk definitely has its own flavor as does FR and your assumption is based on a lack of knowledge (the definition of the word).
I've seen him brought up on these forums from time to time and a lot of people seem to know about him. Now, he wasn't really used for much in the game other than in the Gord the Rogue books, but since he appeared in 1e MMII, most of those who played in the days of yore knew about him.Well, you know, cats. Sneaky little bastards, I didn't see him.
Still a pretty obscure reference, and just an example of skimpy lore. Basically boils down to "Created by a being that almost no one knows, tabaxi are humanoid cats. Except when they aren't."
Yet people don't care, they're just happy to play a purring furry.
I know they're not exactly the same. But they're interchangeable to me in the same way Barqs and A&W root beer are. They both taste slightly different, but I don't particularly care which one you serve me.
This doesn’t really track, since 4e was absolutely chock full of lore.There is also the possibility that at this point the vast majority of players have no other experience then 5e and others only have experience with 4e & 5e. So it's not a matter of preferring 5e's approach to, it's having too little experience with anything else, so they could be open to more lore, we just don't know.
So you agree with the OP that 5e is not the Golden Age of lore generation?See... the thing is: All the old lore is still there.
And just like it has always been, it's there to pick and choose.
You wanna run a 5e game in the Time of Troubles? Go right ahead. No one's gonna stop you. Update Ruins of Myth Drannor for your home game while you're at it.
They certainly haven't ADDED a boatload to the body of lore that D&D has across it's various settings. And the changes made (Ravenloft for example) haven't always been met with resounding cheers... but it doesn't really matter.
Because it's all out there. Every book still exists. And WotC sells more and more of them every day on the DMs Guild and stuff.
You want the Dark Sun Boxed Set? Here y'go.
![]()
Dark Sun Boxed Set (2e) - Wizards of the Coast | AD&D 2nd Ed. | Dark Sun | AD&D 2nd Ed. | Dungeon Masters Guild
Dark Sun Boxed Set (2e) - Amid the barren wastelands of Athas lie the scattered city-states, each in the grip of its own, tyrannical sorcerer-kingwww.dmsguild.com
PDF or soft-cover. Your choice. Shipped or downloaded however you like it. It's still there.
Does that mean they're not going to make more content for old settings? CLEARLY that's not the case as Ravenloft and Spelljammer and Forgotten Realms and more continue to trundle down the pipeline to us.
But it's a trimmed down version great for introducing new players and DMs to the setting, with old soldiers like ourselves able to say "You're wetting your toes, but if you look here you can swim." and hand them the old books.
They're just not -glutting- the market like they used to.
The 3e FRCS was perfectly cromulent for starting a person off getting their head wrapped around the Forgotten Realms. The 5e FRCS is not.To contain all the lore that was vomited up in previous editions that would be a single book the size of the Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
No one new to D&D could possibly learn the Forgotten Realms. You either know it because you grew up with it, or you don't.