Absolutely could be. Seems like a lot of overlap though. What with Radiant Citadel and Spelljammer already. If the sales numbers Ben Riggs is dropping are accurate, you'd think WotC would do something with more sales, not fewer. But who knows how the old sales numbers translate to modern fans' buying habits, if they do at all.
That's slightly off. It's been name dropped 2-3 times before in 5E. If I remember, it's mentioned in the DMG, Tasha's, and somewhere else.
Unless something has changed, there are two entirely new, non-MtG settings in the pipeline for 2023 in addition to the classic setting (potentially Planescape) and everything else (adventures and other supplements) that round out the typical annual release list, so I feel there's still plenty of room for some "down-to-earth" D&D in the schedule, while still giving us plane-hopping junkies our fix.I kinda hope they dont go for Planescape next. 3 releases about plane hopping stuff is a little much since I prefer some more down-to-earth (literally) D&D.
At least Dragonlance isnt Astral adventuring, but I miss more basic adventure stuff like the first published adventures or Saltmarsh.
Just my opinion, tho
We know the old sales numbers have zero relationship to the modern game because multiple books have appeared in the best sellers list, the PHB regularly reappears in the top ten, and the game continues to grow its largest fanbase ever.
That they don't match is obvious, but we don't know if there's zero relationship. We don't know the new sales numbers. We don't actually know the old sales numbers either, we just have one person who's claiming to know and report them. But I'd be surprised if there was no correlation at all. Like a really popular setting from back-in-the-day is quite likely to also be really popular now. Conversely, a really unpopular setting from back then is quite likely to also be unpopular now. Not guaranteed, obviously, as the fanbase is orders of magnitude larger, but I'm willing to be there is some correlation. If nothing else, nostalgia sales alone should make old popular settings popular now if released.
I don't know. It seems that the vast majority of the time you will be hours to days away from a planet, so I don't need rules to announce that you can't hold your breath for that long.
I'll probably go with max hit points, rather than current hit points. That way size is generally going to be what matters.
Winninger went out of his way on Twitter to say that the Radiant Citadel isn't a replacement for Sigil, and in addition to the recent UA with direct Planescape references there are a bunch scattered throughout Monsters of the Multiverse. If anything, all the multiverse hustle and bustle might make a Planescape product more likely, to tie in the unified cosmology.
Ah, sorry, I meant the first explicit named rope in relation to the Spelljammer product, though we had Sussex out a cameo was likely for the reasons outlined previously.
Dark Sun is also mentioned in the PHB. It just as easily be "Here's the location of Athas if you want to run it based on old material."
