Pretty much this. It's really easy to find something that is questionable somewhere if you are trying & cast a wide enough net. Since the common example has been wotc's hadozi I figured it's time to add the time wotc's parent(?) company hasbro gave a transformer a name that is also a swear word to the example pile.That WOTC is the sole decider is the issue; it gives them essentially unlimited ability to pull the plug and point at the morals clause.
Pretty much this. It's really easy to find something that is questionable somewhere if you are trying & cast a wide enough net. Since the common example has been wotc's hadozi I figured it's time to add the time wotc's parent(?) company hasbro gave a transformer a name that is also a swear word to the example pile.
Slag (Transformers)
Template:Multiple issues Slag is the name of a fictional character in the various Transformers universes. He is a Dinobot. In 2007, it was realized that "slag" is a swear word in the United Kingdom (as well as post-Beast Wars Transformers culture, though the real-life term is more of a sexual...neoencyclopedia.fandom.com
Exactly, when you use the OGL 1.0a, you keep control of your own Property Identity.Honestly, I think the morality clause and content creator badge provisions should be pulled, and be made part of a separate licensing agreement.
The whole thing should be pulled. If they want to create a STL or GSL 2.0 to handle trademark protection, that's their business. This whole thing would be fine if it wasn't trying to steal something back from the commons.Honestly, I think the morality clause and content creator badge provisions should be pulled, and be made part of a separate licensing agreement.
There's no way the WotC agrees to not be on the panel, is there? Because couldn't it then be used against them?If they are really serious about stomping out hate join the OCR and let a panel decide and based on past history WOTC should not be permitted to be a voting member on that panel.