Homicidal_Squirrel
Adventurer
This is where I have a bit of confusion. Why would someone make a suggestion that they wouldn't be comfortable with? I've asked several times for others to suggest what hey would do in WoTC's position, and I think only one person gave a response that wasn't, "Not send Pinkerton." Then when they give alternatives it's going to be alternatives that they don't like, either? It just doesn't make sense to me.I think most people are uncomfortable with both scenarios based on what we know about what happened.
But how would you or WoTC know if any rules have been broken if this guy hasn't spoken to them? As much as we'd like to have a discussion on the facts of the incident, we have to admit we are only able to have a discussion on the statement this YouTuber has made, the published reports, and our own interpretations of what we've read and assumed happened.When people have said 'if something illegal happened they could have called the police' part of the reason that is being said is because we think they sent pinkerton in because no laws were broken (or nothing that rose beyond something that couldn't be mediated if it were) and maybe even did so because they were using a gray area to intimidate him.
That being said, WoTC should also be given a bit of room here since they could not figure out how this guy got the cards. They don't know if laws were broken or not. As has been pointed out, there were previously published videos where he supposedly said he knew they were unreleased cards that he got from a friend. Again, I have no proof, but assuming this is true, I'd wonder how he got them. Who is his friend? How did his friend get them?
If you'd like to assume that this was something he got his hands on by mistake, are you assuming that WoTC new how this guy got his hands on the cards before they were able to make contact with him? I get it, WoTC doesn't have the best reputation. Were they D-bags with the whole OGL thing? Yup, for sure. 100%. Glad they got kicked in the nuts for it, too. It should happen more often (kicking WoTC in the nuts). But does that mean every single thing they do they are wrong to do? That's a bit extreme, to be honest.
I'd guess it depends on the value. Report someone has stolen goods in their possession and you know where they are, and it isn't out of the realm of possibilities that some police department will show up with you. You could report someone has a stolen car, and have police go in to get it. A friend had police show up to her house because some guy reported that a car she had just bought was stolen. Cops showed up. They wanted to arrest everyone. THe guy that made the report was there. My friend showed she legally bought the car. THe guy had lost it because he either didn't make his payments and it was repoed, or he had it towed and didn't pay the towing company to get his car.I think police showing up at the guy's house for a pack of cards would also be a very bad thing to do (and I imagine most police departments aren't going to show up at a guy's house over a deck of cards).
Either way, he lost the car, had a friend at the DMV tell him who had the car. He reported it to the cops. They showed up. So yeah, WoTC could have potentially used cops, but wouldn't that be even worse? Using actual law enforcement, which could have given this guy the same information, or threats - depending on how you want to look at it, and had the capacity to arrest him and take him out of his house in cuff in front of the neighbors he didn't want to know about his business.
What would you have done in WoTC's position? What choice would you have made if you'd tried to reach out and gotten no response?