WotC may have sent the Pinkertons to a magic leakers home. Update: WotC confirms it and has a response.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wasn't claiming it was a formal term.
So what were you claiming? Formal or informal, the phrase "IP" doesn't create property.
And what I find astonishing is the people who are attacking WotC for defending their intellectual property (an INFORMAL term), are the exact same people who are leaping to the defence of artists and writers against AI systems.

It's basically one law for corporations (boo hiss) and another for individuals (yay).

Massive hypocrisy.
Not that I'm one of those people, but there is nothing hypocritical about wanting individuals to have more rights than faceless corporations.
 

log in or register to remove this ad



I'LL CARRY YOU WITH ME!
To quote Gloria gaynor, I will survive
flying-squirrel-landscape.jpg
 


So what were you claiming? Formal or informal, the phrase "IP" doesn't create property.

Not that I'm one of those people, but there is nothing hypocritical about wanting individuals to have more rights than faceless corporations.
Right. But how do we separate that from the current conversation? There are two sides to this conversation to date: one that anoints the receiver of these Magic cards to sainthood (when circumstancial evidence seems to indicate the opposite) and the other that doesn't acknowledge at least the possibility of a jackbooted approach from Hasbro (as tenuous and unlikely as the possibility of nefariousness on the part of Hasbro might seem in my opinion... it is possible).
 



So what were you claiming? Formal or informal, the phrase "IP" doesn't create property.
I'm not creating anything. The concept of intellectual property implies that someone who creates something has some form of ownership over that thing. Of course the concept of an "idea" is difficult to pin down and define legally, but property is easier. If something can be property, then taking it without permission is theft.

There are some people who say that property is theft. And that would apply to intellectual property too. But that is generally people who don't have any.
Not that I'm one of those people, but there is nothing hypocritical about wanting individuals to have more rights than faceless corporations.
But corporations are not "faceless" are they? That is just a pejorative used to justify irrational prejudice, just like lots of other hate speech words. The truth is a corporation is a collection of individuals. Individuals created the art on those magic cards. Individuals wrote those rules. Individuals who depend on the corporation to pay their salaries, individuals who will suffer if the corporation is harmed.
 
Last edited:

Right. But how do we separate that from the current conversation? There are two sides to this conversation to date: one that anoints the receiver of these Magic cards to sainthood (when circumstancial evidence seems to indicate the opposite) and the other that doesn't acknowledge at least the possibility of a jackbooted approach from Hasbro (as tenuous and unlikely as the possibility of nefariousness on the part of Hasbro might seem in my opinion... it is possible).
We may never actually know the facts here. I'd like to hear the Pinkertons agents version of the story. From the actual agents who were on the assignment, not in some statement written by a WotC PR rep from half a continent away.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top