Gammadoodler
Hero
It's pretty simple.I believe so, a given set of rules compel players to put on the back bench old buddies because they choose to play fighter. That is easy manipulation.
Imagine I give you a cookbook and tell you "Here is how you make 12 kinds of omelettes". You follow the recipes perfectly, but 4 of them don't include eggs.
The 4 eggless omelettes don't turn out as good as the ones with eggs.
You can say..
"duh, who follows bad instructions in a recipe, obviously the person using it should just change it"
You can say..
"What fool doesn't love an eggless omelette?"
Or you can say..
"How the heck do you make an omelette cookbook and forget to include eggs as an ingredient in some of your recipes"
It seems you prefer the first option, and anyone with enough experience with cooking omelettes would probably make that call.
But..not everyone has that experience.
Annnnnddd..
It is the job of the people who put the recipes in the cookbook to give the users all the information they need to prepare the meals in the table of contents of that cookbook.
To summarize this tortured analogy..
Expecting the rules to produce a good play experience is not unreasonable or indicative of any kind of character flaw.
Last edited: