Would you consider this a mountain?Any natural geographical feature that rises from the ground that is notably impressive, and is awe-inspiring?![]()
That would be a geographical formation known as a "pillar", usually formed by the action of running water. If something doesn't look even vaguely like the following, I have a difficult time considering it to be a mountain.Would you consider this a mountain? View attachment 321226
yeah living in the alpine zone between Tongariro (6,490) and Pihanga (4,350) I'm often amused when people elsewhere mention their local 'mountain' when its less than 1000 ft, though I’m okay with Mountain being used for hills over 500 ft.
In Schleswig-Holstein, we have mountains that are 20 meters above sea level. And maybe 10 meters above the surrounding landscape. Though while they have "berg" in their name, I think everyone would still call them a hill.
When RPG maps indicate an area as mountains, my assumption is that its side are too steep to have a closed cover of vegetation. Though of course lack of water or lack of soil can still get you hills of bare rock as well.
My rule of thumb would be that you have to climb a mountain, but you hike up a hill. Though again, some conical volcanoes have very flat and smooth slopes that you can walk up to the top but are still absolutely massive in size.
Even as a Sea German, I would say that the Brocken in central Germany is a big hill and not a mountain. But Ben Nevis in Britain certainly looks like one, even though it's not a lot taller.
The highest point in Wisconsin is 425 feet above the surrounding land. 1000 must sound pretty damn tall in that context.Don't feel too bad. White Plume Mountain is only 1100' tall. As it's a Strombolian volcano, compare it to the real Stromboli- 3,031 fee