WotC [Updated!] Hasbro Laying Off 1,100 Employees

IMG_2137.png

Just announced, Hasbro will be laying off an additional 1,100 employees after laying off 800 earlier this year. Some will be laid off this week, some over the coming months. People affected so far include Mike Mearls, Dan Dillon, Amy Dallen, and others.

CEO Chris Cocks commented that “headwinds we saw through the first nine months of the year have continued into Holiday are likely to persist into 2024”. An email to staff, also published in the Wall Street Journal, said:

While we’re confident in the future of Hasbro, the current environment demands that we do more, even if these choices are some of the hardest we have to make.

I know this news is especially difficult during the holiday season. There is no sugar-coating how hard this is, particularly for the employees directly affected.

The issues appear to largely affect Hasbro’s extensive toy sales business. Various folk working on D&D at WotC have started making statements which indicate that layoffs are happening right now:
  • D&D designer Dan Dillon: “Well. Today was my last day at Wizards. Not sure what's next.”
  • Graphic designer Trystan Falcone: “To everyone at WotC getting cut today & especially my fellow D&D team members: May your talent & passion be recognized and rewarded by the lucky teams that snatch you up. You are irreplaceable. To other studios, we are losing incredible folks. Scoop them ASAP. It’s Hasbro's loss.
  • Dixon Dubow, creator relations: “Words cannot describe. So many talented friends and coworkers, simply gone.”
  • Art director Bree Heiss: “Much to my surprise, it is my last day at Wizards. It was an honor and a joy to work on the games I love with people who have become family. If you know anywhere that is looking for a sassy art director with some mad skills, please let me know.”
  • Senior Development Editor Eytan Bernstein: "Hi folks. I was one of the people laid of during the Hasbro layoff this week. I know of four other people on the D&D team who confirmed they were affected, but I'll leave it to them if they want to post about it. This includes folks on the art, design, editorial, and product management depts., and that's just who I've heard about. I have a giant ball of emotions right now. I haven't figured out my next steps yet. If you know of an opportunity that might be a good fit for me, please let me know. I am open for freelance (or full-time) design, editing, fiction, and inclusivity reviews. If it combines RPGs with education, accessibility, or inclusivity, that's also cool. I freely welcome positive thoughts, hugs, and "you're awesomes!" I don't feel awesome right now."
  • Amy Dallen, DnD Beyond producer/host: "I’m deeply proud of the work I got to do at D&D Beyond and Wizards. Thank you to everyone who played a role in those many good memories. I’m not sure what’s next, but I do hope you’ll continue to support the incredible colleagues who remain, who I’ll miss very much."
  • Larry Frum, senior communicatons manager: "As part of the recent Hasbro headcount reductions, I have been let go from Wizards of the Coast, effective itoday. I cannot tell you how honored it has been to work with the wonderful and talented people at WOTC. Being a part of Wizards was a dream job come true for me when I joined a little over a year ago. It is time to start a "new game" and roll for initiative on my next adventure. Please let me know if you hear of anything where I might be a good fit. Excited by what is next."
  • Mike Mearls--previously senior management on D&D but who has been on the MtG team for a few years now--is also one of the people let go, along with many other people working on the Magic: The Gathering side of WotC: "Yes, I was laid off by WotC. Yes, I am doing fine and excited by what's to come. And yes, I have a pretty amazing circle of friends. I'm going to take a nap then get back to the work of forging the future."
  • David McDarby, game designer on MtG: "Sadly, my position at Wizards of the Coast was eliminated today along with many others due to the Hasbro layoffs. I've absolutely loved working at WotC and making Magic Tabletop/MTGO/MTG Arena the best it can be these past 9 years, and I'm looking for my next opportunity!"
  • Paul Cheon, talent manager: “Unfortunately, I will no longer be working for WotC as I was one of the many that were hit by the Hasbro layoffs. It was an absolute dream to work on the game that I've loved playing for over 20 years. Future is unclear but I may fire up a stream after the New Year!”
  • Rob Sather, D&D Art Manager: “Yesterday was surprisingly my last day of work at Wizards as D&D TRPG Studio's Art Manager. My position was eliminated, nothing to do with performance. Can't even utter a snarky quip or light-hearted anecdote, just feeling gutted.”
  • Other confirmed folks include Chris Lindsay (who created DMs Guild), Liz Schuh (licensing and publishing manager), Natalie Egan, community manager Jesse J Hill, and art director Mike Vaillancourt, Vanessa Cuanan (Associate Systems Administrator), Michael Rexford (Senior Data Scientist), Ellie Lockhart (Analytics Engineer), Jana Hodgins (Technical Producer), Megan Galbraith Donahue (Director of MTG Universes Beyond Creative and Production), Deserae Dawn, (Program Manager), David Hartless (D&D Beyond director), Shay Pierce (senior software engineer).
Chris Cocks’ full email reads as follows:

Team,  

A year ago, we laid out our strategy to focus on building fewer, bigger, better brands and began the process of transforming Hasbro. Since then, we’ve had some important wins, like retooling our supply chain, improving our inventory position, lowering costs, and reinvesting over $200M back into the business while growing share across many of our categories. But the market headwinds we anticipated have proven to be stronger and more persistent than planned. While we’re confident in the future of Hasbro, the current environment demands that we do more, even if these choices are some of the hardest we have to make.

Today we’re announcing additional headcount reductions as part of our previously communicated strategic transformation, affecting approximately 1,100 colleagues globally in addition to the roughly 800 reductions already taken.

Our leadership team came to this difficult decision after much deliberation. We recognize this is heavy news that affects the livelihoods of our friends and colleagues. Our focus is communicating with each of you transparently and supporting you through this period of change. I want to start by addressing why we are doing this now, and what’s next.

Why now?

We entered 2023 expecting a year of change including significant updates to our leadership team, structure, and scope of operations. We anticipated the first three quarters to be challenging, particularly in Toys, where the market is coming off historic, pandemic-driven highs. While we have made some important progress across our organization, the headwinds we saw through the first nine months of the year have continued into Holiday and are likely to persist into 2024.

To position Hasbro for growth, we must first make sure our foundation is solid and profitable. To do that, we need to modernize our organization and get even leaner. While we see workforce reductions as a last resort, given the state of our business, it’s a lever we must pull to keep Hasbro healthy.

What happens next?

While we’re making changes across the entire organization, some functional areas will be affected more than others. Many of those whose roles are affected have been or will be informed in the next 24 hours, although the timings will vary by country, in line with local rules and subject to employee consultations where required. This includes team members who have raised their hands to step down from their roles at the end of the year as part of our Voluntary Early Retirement Program (VRP) in the U.S. We’re immensely grateful to these colleagues for their many years of dedication, and we wish them all the best.

The majority of the notifications will happen over the next six months, with the balance occurring over the next year as we tackle the remaining work on our organizational model. This includes standardizing processes within Finance, HR, IT and Consumer Care as part of our Global Business Enablement project, but it also means doing more work across the entire business to minimize management layers and create a nimbler organization.

What else are we doing?

I know this news is especially difficult during the holiday season. We value each of our team members – they aren’t just employees, they’re friends and colleagues. We decided to communicate now so people have time to plan and process the changes. For those employees affected we are offering comprehensive packages including job placement support to assist in their transition.

We’ve also done what we can to minimize the scale of impact, like launching the VRP and exploring options to reduce our global real estate footprint. On that note, our Providence, Rhode Island office is currently not being used to its full capacity and we’ve decided to exit the space at the end of the lease term in January 2025. Over the next year, we’ll welcome teams from our Providence office to our headquarters down the road in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. It’s an opportunity to reshape how we work and ensure our workspace is vibrant and productive, while reflecting our more flexible in-person cadence since the pandemic.

Looking ahead

As Gina often says, cost-cutting is not a strategy. We know this, and that’s why we’ll continue to grow and invest in several areas in 2024.

As we uncover more cost savings, we’ll invest in new systems, insights and analytics, product development and digital – all while strengthening our leading franchises and ensuring our brands have the essential marketing they need to thrive well into the future.

We’ll also tap into unlocked potential across our business, like our new supply chain efficiency, our direct-to-consumer capabilities, and key partnerships to maximize licensing opportunities, scale entertainment, and free up our own content dollars to drive new brand development.

I know there is no sugar-coating how hard this is, particularly for the employees directly affected. We’re grateful to them for their contributions, and we wish them all the best. In the coming weeks, let’s support each other, and lean in to drive through these necessary changes, so we can return our business to growth and carry out Hasbro’s mission.

Thanks,
Chris
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

So presumptuous you quoted it thrice.

But in all honesty I would consider 2 years a long time. Though from your earlier posts, it almost sounds like you haven’t checked anything since 2008.
Yup, thrice posted mistakenly, while editing on my mobile.
Wow, 2008???!!! Dude, 4E Era worse than 5E! OK, let's see, 2008 would be before my two sons were born and I know I was introduced to 5E after that. Out of the blue a bud wanted to try DMing 5E - Hoard of the Dragonqueen, and I gave 5E a whirl as a player. Buds wife had a child so game ended, never completed. That was before the pandemic, so 2015? Had the Dragon + magazine app to keep updated on Dungeons and Dragons monthly 5E articles, lots of free downloads as gaming aides. The app did not have the same charm the defunct Dragon and Dungeon and RPGA magazines had, especially when compared to the Adventure Paths by Paizo who published the magazines before WOTC pulled the license and went paper free; thus the Dragon + app was born, which I deleted because I did not play anything 5E, until I purchased Platinum Dragon Heist from Beadle and Grimm in first year 2020 of Pandemic. I just jumped in to DM 5E, purchasing all core books - big mistake, and jumped back out - never completed adventure. Cabin fever gave me the internet itch, and I purchased many 5E books online. The worst I have read are Spelljammer and Into The Abyss (Car Wars by Steve Jackson Games may liven it up). The Princes of the Apocalypse was ok, usable as an expansion to the original or super module Temple of Elemental Evil. Tomb of Anihilation is ok, and also could be an expansion to one or all the Tomb of Horrors Editions published. The rest of 5E are gawd awful. Looking at my library, I actually own many 5E books, including a duplicate Rime of the Frostmaiden - both copies never opened, never read. (Anyone in Toronto want one perfect condition for 50% off, it's yours. I won't mail it so meet me at a Tim's.)
Because of my D&D loyalty, I truly wanted to give 5E a chance, but have moved on to DCC RPG and many Kickstarters, ironically some are 5E with great source material, compared to WOTC material.
My comment is relevant to the Thread Topic, too. For me, the Hasbro/WOTC layoff may be a good thing because I have disliked most 5E material I have read and new staff may create better material in 2024 and I return to D&D full throttle. I was suggested on this thread to wait and check out Infinite Staircase in 2024 because it may have a couple of interesting adventure hooks I may want to use myself. But yes, I have into dabbled 5E since 2008.
 

Not at the expensive of the core product. If you neglect the primary target audience and invest profit into frivolous items without the goal to intice more gamers, the quality of the primary product diminishes, as 5E D&D adventure books has, IMO. Don't judge a book by its cover is quite the opposite with me now, when shopping for D&D books, the awesome art covers mean nothing to me now because I know most written material inside is quite embarrassingly bad.
"Oh, hey, look, there are magnets with images of items for a Bag of Holding!" Junk, only interesting to a D&D fan, and more interesting than the rabble inside D&D books today. This action is what kills D&D core products and lays off employees at WOTC D&D team.
"The best avenue for continued profit in a public company conveniently lines up with my personal preferences as a customer"

Hmm...
 

What do you think the point of a company is?
Providing goods and services. That is the reason we have laws providing for their existence (for example, by granting limited liability, so creditors cannot go after the personal assets of the owners if the company goes bust).

Profit is merely one of the incentives we offer people to form, run, and invest in companies -- and it is far from the only one. I know several small business owners who could make quite a bit more money if they sold their businesses and took conventional jobs.
 

Providing goods and services. That is the reason we have laws providing for their existence (for example, by granting limited liability, so creditors cannot go after the personal assets of the owners if the company goes bust).

People don't set up companies to "provide goods and services". You can do that via a charity if you are so inclined. People set up a company to make a profit.

Profit is merely one of the incentives we offer people to form, run, and invest in companies -- and it is far from the only one. I know several small business owners who could make quite a bit more money if they sold their businesses and took conventional jobs.
Yes. But they still want to make profit.


Over and over in this thread I see people conflating what they want from WoTC as a customer with what it should be doing to be successful as a company. It may be that the people running WoTC are idiots. But it is equally possible that this thread is a whole bunch of people upset at decisions they don't like and twisting things to argue that not only should WoTC be doing what they want but that it is also the best (and only) decision that should be made in the interest in shareholders.

It's ok to say "I think WoTC should do X because as a customer that's what I want it to do." You don't need to dress it up in "I'm only looking out for shareholders" nonsence.

Case in point. It was awesome in the 90s when TSR published tons of great boxed sets and I would never wish it away. Was it great for TSR the company? No way. But I don't care!
 




How is any of the discussions of pay scales, inflation, economic forecasts appropriate to a D&D thread?

Mod Note:
This thread is about the business of making of D&D - which is perfectly valid grist for a site that lays claim to "News and Reviews" as EN Wrld does right in the upper left hand corner logo.

Your berating of people for engaging in it is the inappropriate item present.

This is not an economics forum


And you are not a person who owns or operates the forum such that you should be publicly policing the content.


I'll go back to ignoring.


Please do. I'll relieve you of the need to post in this thread any further

And next time, leave folks alone. If you have a question as to the content, please put it in a post report.
 

People don't set up companies to "provide goods and services". You can do that via a charity if you are so inclined. People set up a company to make a profit.
they also set them up for many other reasons, personal, and other. to simply say they only set up companie's to make profits is just silly.

but yes they do need to make profits to continue.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top