Vaalingrade
Legend
It's pretty much the fault of the tech bros hijacking the term 'AI' for the new fallback buzzword after NFT failed.
Nothing we say here on forums like this means anything
I saw a show or video on how the whaling industry collapsed in a year and a half after Rockefeller started selling kerosene. I do not think saving(ish) the whales was his plan, but a good side benefit. But I get the idea of a slow transformation of cars putting out farriers and breeders of horses taking a generation not being as big a disruption.Part of what makes this different than what's come before is the speed. To convert from horses to cars took decades. From leeches to medicine took decades. From ice boxes to fridges... you get the idea.
With what's occurred with generative AI, for artists it could be a year or two.
As I said,I'd have more sympathy if I knew how you jump from "AI may be used as a DM aid" to end of times apocalypse.
To be a bit more specific, the suffering I’m referring to is the mass loss of jobs in writing and art. The fossil energy cost is pretty self-explanatory; these large language models take huge amounts of processing power, which for the time being requires the burning of fossil fuels to achieve, rapidly accelerating climate change, which in turn causes more human suffering as disastrous weather events become more frequent and more intense, large areas become less hospitable leading to mass human migration, which has its own huge list of negative impacts, including yet more job insecurity. The global information literacy crisis is a complex topic, but in brief, the ease of access to information coupled with the difficulty of evaluating the validity of that information is how we end up with the recent explosion of conspiracy thinking. This is further intensified by the aforementioned job insecurity, as people become more prone to conspiracy thinking when they feel a lack of control in their lives. AI is massively increasing this problem as it dumps more information into the collective pool at a rate orders of magnitude higher than real humans are capable of, with absolutely no regard for the accuracy of that information. Meanwhile tech companies are racing to get AI more and more involved in the ways we access this information.It’s causing real human people real suffering, at the cost of tremendous amounts of fossil energy, in order to produce torrents of slop writing and “art,” accelerating the global information literacy crisis in the process.
I don’t believe that is the case. The television, the indoor toilet, the refrigerator. These went from scarce to common in the space of 10 years. Four transformative technologies that changed people’s lives in a single decade.I saw a show or video on how the whaling industry collapsed in a year and a half after Rockefeller started selling kerosene. I do not think saving(ish) the whales was his plan, but a good side benefit. But I get the idea of a slow transformation of cars putting out farriers and breeders of horses taking a generation not being as big a disruption.
Taken individually sure. Social media absolutely proves that if you agitate the water enough, waves are made.
So yes, suppression of peoples concern, censorship, even on a niche forum, absolutely does have an impact.
If you really didn't think it did, you wouldn't continue with various arguments you have made in the past, such as the ones around the OGL, you would simply shrug and move on.
Think also airplanes, the telegraph, then radio and phones. There have been a lot of transformative technologies that made a big difference in a relatively short time. Not all of them were anticipated, I doubt the Wright brothers expected WWI to have people doing dogfights a decade later.I don’t believe that is the case. The television, the indoor toilet, the refrigerator. These went from scarce to common in the space of 10 years. Four transformative technologies that changed people’s lives in a single decade.
Nah. You're exaggerating my position. I think we will get some decent stuff - I'm an optimist. But my experience with corporations in recent years suggests that however optimistic I am that a CEO might be talking about something good, it's not usually the case.So you assume the worst.![]()
He never said that.Nah. You're exaggerating my position. I think we will get some decent stuff - I'm an optimist. But my experience with corporations in recent years suggests that however optimistic I am that a CEO might be talking about something good, it's not usually the case.
I mean, when Cocks said, "We think that D&D is undermonetised" I AGREED. I think it is too! But he and I are not talking about the same thing.
CEOs going to CEOThey couldn't skip saying or doing something controversial for the 50th anniversary?