WotC really wanting to make nothics a thing in 5E is such an interesting choice.Taking a crack at listing all the monsters shown.
So for the front cover, we seem to have a Demilich (?), a Kraken, a Gelatinous Cube, a Beholder, an Ogre, a Displacer Beast, a Mimic, some bats that could be shapechanged Vampires (?), and some Hobgoblins.
On the back cover we have a Nothic, a Harpy, two smaller Beholders or Beholder-Kin (?), a Green Hag, a Gnoll, a Kobold, a Modron, a Goblin, a Zombie, a few Myconids, an Intellect Devourer, a Mind Flayer, an Owlbear, a Balor (?), the Tentacles could be another smaller Kraken (?), and if I were a betting gal I'd say the big eye in the middle is from a Green Dragon.
Overall I really like this cover and the variety of well known monsters displayed.
I hate venegers design.
Why?I hate venegers design.
Doesnt really spark interest in me. Dont like his horns, colors, of pose. All subjective, just not my tastes.Why?
He was given a stat block in Wild Beyond the Witchlight along with other members of the League of Malevolence and Valor's Call.Are these covers trying to be easter eggs for upcoming adventures like the original 5e ones were?
Is Venger the next BBEG after Vecna?
Is Zarak going to become a full orc assassin? Is he still evil? Does he still have the Battle-Matic stabbing action?
View attachment 366169
I don't think those were Easter eggs so much as what WotC was interested in at the time.Are these covers trying to be easter eggs for upcoming adventures like the original 5e ones were?