D&D (2024) Ranger 2024 is a bigger joke than Ranger 2014:

[CapnZapp]

You're saing to wait for WotC to screw up the Monk after all too?

I don't think I need to say anything.

I might need more popcorn though...

 

[Not a Decepticon]

No. Doubling down because you throw around derogatives. This is no adult conversation.

Why engage with you on a serious level then?

tone policing in defense of honor of...bunch of words in a wizards game. Are you for real?

And can you agree it's a flavor fail when a class about being martial artist, which is all about technique, is one class not allowed access to any of technique mechanics, while a class all about attacking widly, with pure strength and without thinking, gets access to techniques?

 

[UngeheuerLich]

tone policing in defense of honor of...bunch of words in a wizards game. Are you for real?

It is no policing. It is just etiquette.* You might learn that in a few years.

And can you agree it's a flavor fail when a class about being martial artist, which is all about technique, is one class not allowed access to any of technique mechanics, while a class all about attacking widly, with pure strength and without thinking, gets access to techniques?

Ok. So monk's unarmed fighting arbitrarily does not count as a technique for you. Understood. No need to argue then.

*maybe more than etiquette. As this is the origin of "moron":

"Moron" was coined in 1910 by psychologist Henry H. Goddard from the Ancient Greek word μωρός (moros), which meant "dull" and used to describe a person with a mental age in adulthood of between 7 and 10 on the Binet scale.

So you just used that and made a connection with real people and flailing arms and such. I am not sure this sheds a good light on you.

 

[Not a Decepticon]

It is no policing. It is just etiquette. You might learn that in a few years.

You're defending honor of an rpg class

Ok. So monk's unarmed fighting arbitrarily does not count as a technique for you. Understood. No need to argue then.

It is not presented as a technique, just as a basic punch. Unlike maneuvers of weapon mastery there is nothing that actually makes each strike different from all previous strikes.

 

[UngeheuerLich]

You're defending honor of an rpg class

I don't even know what you want to say here.

I edited my previous post to help you why I think your use of words is inappropriate.

It is not presented as a technique, just as a basic punch. Unlike maneuvers of weapon mastery there is nothing that actually makes each strike different from all previous strikes.

If you say so.

 

[Not a Decepticon]

So you just used that and made a connection with real people and flailing arms and such. I am not sure this sheds a good light on you.

I think and trust that everyone here understands that I am talking about nonexistant character, literally bunch of rules making a blank slate, and how lck of access to any mechanic making them reflect use of martial arts technique the way weapon mastry and maneuvers do, makes the class look like they're incompetent and don';t know how to actually fight. You are so desperate to shut me up you made a reach so big Strech Armstrong covers his head in shame.

 

[UngeheuerLich]

I think and trust that everyone here understands that I am talking about nonexistant character,

It does not matter. You use terms that were used to describe real people and associate them with certain behaviours. Which is not ok.

literally bunch of rules making a blank slate, and how lck of access to any mechanic making them reflect use of martial arts technique the way weapon mastry and maneuvers do, makes the class look like they're incompetent and don';t know how to actually fight.

If you think so.

You are so desperate to shut me up you made a reach so big Strech Armstrong covers his head in shame.

You can say as much as you like. But not in that way.

But on top of that I think you are wrong and inable to use arguments and just repeat yourself over and over again and you just make bad real world comparisons because you think you are clever. That does not make your points in any way valid.

 

[Not a Decepticon]

But on top of that I think you are wrong and inable to use arguments and just repeat yourself over and over

You are now literally stealing things I have said about you. It does not seem you have any original idea.

It does not matter. You use terms that were used to describe real people and associate them with certain behaviours. Which is not ok.

I will now remind you you were doing jokes about it yourself. I do not think you care one iota. I tihnk you're so mad I don't share your opinion, and you lack an ability to form a real argument, that you're literally grasping at straws. you literally got so mad I pointed out flavor fail in stupid wizard game, you are trying desperatelly to label me as problematic to be able to dismiss me and convince others to do the same. Populist tactic.

 

[UngeheuerLich]

You are now literally stealing things I have said about you. It does not seem you have any original idea.

?

I will now remind you you were doing jokes about it yourself. I do not think you care one iota. I tihnk you're so mad I don't share your opinion, and you lack an ability to form a real argument, that you're literally grasping at straws. you literally got so mad I pointed out flavor fail in stupid wizard game, you are trying desperatelly to label me as problematic to be able to dismiss me and convince others to do the same. Populist tactic.

??

I really can't make sense of your posts. My bad.

 

[Not a Decepticon]

?

??

I really can't make sense of your posts. My bad.

You are not equipped to have this discussion, disengage.