Vaalingrade
Legend
Please remind me who is saying this... deeply confused sentence?It's dumb because a vocal group is forcing something to only be allowed if it's offensive and then saying everything offensive must be removed.
Please remind me who is saying this... deeply confused sentence?It's dumb because a vocal group is forcing something to only be allowed if it's offensive and then saying everything offensive must be removed.
Posters in this thread are only accepting lore that says half orcs are products of unsavory acts and that all other races distrust half elves and half orcs and will not fit in.Please remind me who is saying this... deeply confused sentence?
Tiefling and assaimar were allowed to change. Half elf and half orc weren't.
Why?
Because they aren't named half fiend and half celestial.
Why not?Aasimar and tieflings are a mixture of a "mortal" and an immortal, planar "monster" type. Half-elf and half-orc are the mixture of two specific mortal species. Half-orcs don't happen because a human family got too close to an orc settlement, they happen because a human and an orc bump uglies. That's why the aasimar and tiefling got their lore changed to "influenced by planar energy somehow" and why the half-races are missing. Now, you could have a species of creature influenced by the fey (feytouched) and... Uh, idk? Ugly? (Calibans)
Why not?half-orcs and half-elves get their own species, where are the half-dwarves, half-gnomes, half-dtagonborn, and wilder mixed (dragonborn/orcs, dwarf/elves, goliath/gnomes?)
That's not nearly the same as 'only allowing' things if they're offensive.Posters in this thread are only accepting lore that says half orcs are products of unsavory acts and that all other races distrust half elves and half orcs and will not fit in.
Anytime other inoffensive origins from D&D products is displayed, it is dismissed or ignored and the offensive lore is repeated.
We do not have and have never had this in D&D. Sure there was the possibility of racism when playing a half-elf. And when playing an elf. And when playing a dwarf. And when playing a halfling. And when playing a tiefling. And...Can I address this specific point for a moment: Do we need "Racism, the species?"
Yeah. I saw it once in a while, but the vast majority of half-elves that I've seen played over the years don't lean into the racism aspect.Maybe because I didn't see much Half-Elf play in the 2nd ed era, this isn't something I've come across. In Rolemaster, and 4e D&D, and now in my Torchbearer game, Half-Elves have one human and one Elven parent, but don't particularly bring this Tanis stuff with them.
Who is seeking to erase anything?I see seeking to erase said themes from the most famous fantasy RPG as a strike against storytelling for everyone because some people don't want it in their games.
I keep getting told that half-elves are one of the most powerful races out there.It's just that being a half-elf does not make you a weaker elf with a couple of different proficiencies.
Which is utterly horrible. Now there's no such thing as a half-elf. Just elves or humans painted with tacky lipstick.Now, you're mechanically an elf. Or whatever you choose.
IOW, every single half-elf is now a unique mechanical creation that is no longer bound by a single definition that all half-elves are identical.