I mean, sorta? But also we had long histories of "you can portray X, but only if you show explicitly that it's evil" or whatever, and... I just don't think that has historically worked out well as a rule to have in media.The Hays Code was an outright prohibition of topics being presented, at all.
I don't object to people saying "yeah we are in fact depicting this as evil and to be opposed", but I'm not sold on the idea that they are obligated to do that.
This is the part I'd missed. I thought you were asserting this as an inherent moral imperative that was simply the only way these topics could ever be addressed in any setting without it being inherently wrong, not as a thing about what WotC would or wouldn't do. (I have no idea what they would or wouldn't publish. Their track record doesn't exactly make me think they think about these issues much.)If you wanna write about it in a way that isn't "Handholdy" or whatever, be my guest. Unlike the Hays Code this isn't going to be imposed on other projects or works. It's just how I'd want to do it to ensure its specific level of 'problematic' is low enough for WotC to publish.
Now if you wanna argue that WotC's standards for their publications are too stringent that's definitely something you could argue. But please do it in a thread dedicated to discussing WotC's standards for publication.