D&D General The New York Times on D&D

I don’t but I see their point. Why was it necessary? Does it help or hurt the brand
WotC expects it to help or they would not do it

Let’s go with for lots of people maybe something they don’t want.
Let's go with most people probably do not mind at a minimum

Elon sees what wotc does and buys it. Now maybe Felicia says bye
I could not care less about that moron, let him do what he feels like doing, I am not going to change my position on something just because he might disagree with it
 

log in or register to remove this ad



I have my doubts about the latter, but let's just give you the benefit of the doubt there... and? Not sure how that relates to anything discussed here
So my biggest concerns
Side point I haven’t bought 5.5 but I’m not switching other brands and I often defend wotc but most likely I will buy in 2025. The inclusion of the race species stuff has no effect on me

-I think a lot of people discount bad de/woke headlines whatever you want to call them. Talking to 3 younger people about dragon age veilguard (which i own) and their first words were I heard it wasn’t good. Now that m not there age but I would argue the voices they heard were loud enough to sway them.
-this headline came out on a mostly slow week in the news. It could get traction and who knows
-hey I thought the art ai and mtg headlines weren’t bad but it seemed to be
-I defended with and the legal agreement that backfired on them
-I defended and still defend them on the handling of Larian and Bg3 but a lot of folks in the video game world disagree

You can call Elon whatever you want but I would argue based on a guess that a lot of people here don’t want him to run this brand and if he did I will still be here.

Wotc has made a lot of miscalculations in the last 2 years+
 


-I think a lot of people discount bad de/woke headlines whatever you want to call them. Talking to 3 younger people about dragon age veilguard (which i own) and their first words were I heard it wasn’t good. Now that m not there age but I would argue the voices they heard were loud enough to sway them.
no idea what they heard, so not sure why you think it is the ‘woke’ part that discouraged them. For that matter I know nothing about the game, so not sure if there is even anything in that regard

-this headline came out on a mostly slow week in the news. It could get traction and who knows
it’s nothing, ‘old man yells at cloud’ seems to summarize it adequately. Even if every person in the US read it, it doubt it would have a measurable impact

-hey I thought the art ai and mtg headlines weren’t bad but it seemed to be
there I can at least see something potentially negative that is relatively widely accepted as such, the article does not really condemn WotC for ‘woke stuff’, it just reports that some grognards are complaining but ends with saying it is the right direction

-I defended with and the legal agreement that backfired on them
not sure I can parse that, so you defended them over the OGL? Guess we are on opposite sides of that too then…

-I defended and still defend them on the handling of Larian and Bg3 but a lot of folks in the video game world disagree
not sure what that argument is even about, I’d say WotC dropped the ball though, so there is no chance for a DLC / more money for WotC from that. Business wise that seems like a loss

You can call Elon whatever you want but I would argue based on a guess that a lot of people here don’t want him to run this brand and if he did I will still be here.
sure, but falling in line proactively to avoid that is the last thing we need. We should ignore that nutcase and he will do whatever he will do, no reason to kowtow to him on anything. I doubt he has any interest in buying WotC, so I am not particularly concerned

Wotc has made a lot of miscalculations in the last 2 years+
yes, being inclusive and staying current is not one of them, and it has been ongoing for more than two years too…

I’d argue none of the mistakes made much of a difference in the long run either. The biggest / only impact was the OGL fiasco, and even that ended up being minimal because they reacted fast enough

So not seeing any negative impact from the 2024 changes either
 



DEAR GOD NEVER READ THE COMMENTS!
It really depends how much you care about gauging public opinion versus raising your blood pressure. I always like to read the comments so I know what the general public (at least the general public that reads that website or paper), rather than the people writing the paper/website, think. But it can be quite aggravating at times.
 


Remove ads

Top