I didn’t have nearly the same trouble with The Brothers Karamazov (the only one I read) for some reason, but I hear you. The style at that time was tortured.Let me introduce you to my 'friend' Fyodor Dostoevsky...
I didn’t have nearly the same trouble with The Brothers Karamazov (the only one I read) for some reason, but I hear you. The style at that time was tortured.Let me introduce you to my 'friend' Fyodor Dostoevsky...
The trick to Dickens is reading it out loud. He liked to perform his work.I firmly believe Dickens is the reason Cliff Notes were invented.
Where does this data come from, and what is it measuring? We need more context!View attachment 399100The publication of 5e more or less exactly coincided with the historical high-point of interest in Howard's stories, and interest remains far higher than it was at the birth of roleplaying. This thread is based on a false premise.
Ngram viewer, so appearances of the string in the google books corpus. I didn't add 'red nails' as I expected there would be more noise than signal with such a common string.What is this actually measuring?
Where is Red Nails?
Why is the poor and horribly racist Queen of the Black Coast above the actually pretty good Beyond the Black River?
What happened in 1865? And why does Beyond the Black River show a blip at that date, when it wasn't published until 1935?
One of Heinlein's characters mentioned learning Russian in order to read RussLit in the original, and declared the originals were even more turgid than the translations. RAH knew at least some Russian, so that may have been first hand experience...I didn’t have nearly the same trouble with The Brothers Karamazov (the only one I read) for some reason, but I hear you. The style at that time was tortured.
I have been repeatedly stumped by your references. I have read a number of Howard Conan and Bran Mak Morn and Solomon Kane and Kull the Conqueror stories but not all and the most recent was over two decades ago.I’m mearly assuming that the people talking about the source material have actually read it.
It’s clear that Conan operates policies that penalise the nobility, who would be responsible for defence in a feudal society, instead choosing to enrich the mercantile classes. He relies of foreign mercenaries for defence - it’s not clear how he pays them - perhaps with the wealth he has personally stolen?
I would call it “heightened”. “Purple Prose” implies poor quality, but this is quite deliberate, in order to establish gravitas. Howard’s ability to write like this was actually a strength. It perhaps suffers a bit by lack of context.
Lovecraft used similar techniques - which would generally be considered over-writing by modern standards.
What is this actually measuring?
Where is Red Nails?
Why is the poor and horribly racist Queen of the Black Coast above the actually pretty good Beyond the Black River?
What happened in 1865? And why does Beyond the Black River show a blip at that date, when it wasn't published until 1935?
I have been repeatedly stumped by your references. I have read a number of Howard Conan and Bran Mak Morn and Solomon Kane and Kull the Conqueror stories but not all and the most recent was over two decades ago.
Conan’s stance on taxes is not something I remember. Was this in the phoenix story?
I'd say S&S was on a comeback until, sadly, Howard Andrew Jones passed away this year. His Chronicles of Hanuvar is fun (What if Hannibal had lost and was now freeing his enslaved people across the Empire.)Look, Conan hasn't been relevant for over a decade at this pont and while certain trapping of Sword-n-sorcery still exists the genre as a whole is far from any influence these days.