And some folks just want all the tables, for free.
Isn't that...a good thing to want? Unless your house is full of tables, I suppose.
It's art. There's no finish line.
Rembrandt was an artist. So was Rothko. Maybe you like one better than the other--maybe you think one was a total hack--but they're both artists who produced art.
No disagreement here. The point was just that "make the art yourself" is not a good solution for everyone, because not everyone wants to or has the time to do so.
I think an example that zeros in on just the quality argument is mapmaking software. Take something like
this page. It makes it much easier for me to generate maps for my RPG games. They're not as good as what you get from
Mike Schley or
Dyson Logos. And all the arguments MoonSong articulated can be expressed.
You know that creative commons is a thing right? Also, plenty of people -including yours truly- actually gift custom art from time to time. Besides, these users might even try to do it themselves, perhaps even discovering a related side hobby in the process?
There are creative commons maps; I could find a generous map maker to make a custom map; or I could try to do it myself. (Other arguments apply here too: the procgen program is not intelligent, it is not creative, it is not imaginative. It may even have negative effects on people who want to make and sell maps).
But none of these fit the bill. Creative commons maps don't always match what I want. Custom maps are much harder to come by. I enjoy map making but it takes me way longer; usually I'll take a procgen one and modify it as I need.
Does anyone find these arguments are
still effective against the use of procgen maps? If not, then I submit that those arguments aren't actually convincing; it all comes down to the ethics.