D&D General I wish people would avoid name-dropping Gary Gygax


log in or register to remove this ad

True, but what would TTRPG'S and everything that has spun off of D&D look like had he stuck with cobbling shoes? For better or worse he was the reason we got D&D. Leadership matters.
Sure, and so does abdication of leadership, which also describes Gygax when he pretty much left running TSR to the Blumes.

Gygax came along and made D&D a commercial concern, starting the role playing game revolution in hobby gaming. That's a huge accomplishment. But so much has occurred since then, so many different ways of looking at these games has been discussed and developed, that nobody's really beholden to his views on games, how they should be run, or how they should be designed. On that topic, he's just one voice among many.
 





It’s one of several games that were evolving in parallel to D&D - they started before D&D. They’d look less like D&D than they do in reality, but probably not radically different. More or fewer stats, different fundamental qualities, different score ranges, but likely recognizable. They were all drawing on the same or similar influences as Gygax and Armeson, along with their own distinctive legacies (like White Bear, Red Moon and Barker’s wargame-ish campaigns).
 
Last edited:


Like it or not, Gygax wasn't Daniel Shipstone and proto-RPGs had been around long before him or Arneson. There's a sheaf of universes where some literary type put together Glass Town and Little Wars...
 


Remove ads

Top