Genre Discussion: Cyberpunk

Those who wrote the core book likely have access to data and assumptions that may not be public.
Just like the secret ingredients in snake oil.

Game design theory is well known to anyone who cares to take an interest, and has moved on since many rules were laid out.
if we are trying to align with the core
Why would we want to align with anything? The point is to have fun, not be boringly conformist.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Nonsense, that’s assigning a godlike level of competence and altruism to the original creators.

The only thing you should trust is your own judgement. Use what you like, by whoever you like, and discard anything you don’t like, even if it was part of the original authors vision. They are a person just like you, their judgment is no better than yours or anyone else’s.
I don't know, not everyone is created equal. These successful IPs/projects are not your average vanity publisher... They are professionals in their field, just like a doctor or a lawyer is a professional in their field. There might be hacks, but we do not tend to talk about the hacks in RPGs and I suspect the popular IPs we're talking about here were not written by hacks.

That said, you are still the arbiter of what you like and do not like. If I like to display the Mona Lisa in it's Lego form, so be it, and Leonardo da Vinci can 'suck it'! ;) But by that same measure, there are others that want to experience x in it's natural form. Two different people can have two different opinions on that and neither be right or wrong...
 

Because unless you are looking to design for just your own table, there could be expectations of balance that people are looking for in a 'designed for X' product?
I don’t believe “original designers” are likely to be any more “balanced” than anyone else. I’ve seen plenty of terribly balanced stuff produced by original designers. It usually takes an edition or two to get the wrinkles sorted out.
 


Why would we want to align with anything? The point is to have fun, not be boringly conformist.
If you purchased a new supplement for a specific game you'd likely expect it to align with the core rulebook, right? For example you'd expect a supplement for Bladerunner to have a similar noir atmosphere rather than turning into a dumb action movie. Don't get me wrong, dumb action movies are fun, but that's not what I'm looking for in a Bladerunner game. You could certainly do something a different, perhaps make a supplement all about playing a replicant or a human ally on the lam, but you'd likely still expect it to somehow align with the core product.
 



Cyberpunk was gobbled up by Transhumanism. I would play Eclipse phase instead of Cyberpunk 2020. The later feels like retro-sci-fi at this juncture.
I think that might apply to the game itself, but you can have cyberpunk without transhumanism just fine. They just would have had to retcon a lot about the background to truly make the game fit the divergent advancements we've experienced since 2020 came out, and chose not to go that way.
 

If you purchased a new supplement for a specific game you'd likely expect it to align with the core rulebook, right?
On the whole, no. I would expect a supplement to do something different with the original idea. Otherwise there is no point, unless the original was missing stuff.

But it really doesn’t matter who makes the supplement - slavishly imitating the original authors is the easiest thing in the world.
 

Remove ads

Top